Can Behavioural Economics Help Explain Gender Disparities in Labour Markets?
Keywords:
Behavioural Economics, Gender Disparities, Labour MarketsAbstract
The presence of pervasive gender disparities integrated into our labour market outcomes (of promotion, pay, and hiring) poses a threat to our current market functions. This paper determines the potential of behavioural economics in bridging these disparities in the context of labour market outcomes. Drawing on insights from the subject, the paper argues that gender disparities in labour market outcomes can be a result of a variety of behavioural biases and heuristics that lead to sub-optimal decision-making. Using the behavioural lens the paper identifies and focuses on three cognitive biases: the endowment effect, the overconfidence bias and the status quo bias. The paper intends to propose interventions and policy modifications to overcome such ubiquitous biases and correct the present labour market climate.
References or Bibliography
[BBL07] Hannah Riley Bowles, Linda Babcock, and Lei Lai. Social incen-
tives for gender differences in the propensity to initiate negotia-
tions: Sometimes it does hurt to ask. Organizational Behavior and
human decision Processes, 103(1):84–103, 2007.
[CB10] Emilio J Castilla and Stephen Benard. The paradox of meritocracy
in organizations. Administrative science quarterly, 55(4):543–676,
[FD18] Martha Fineman and Terence Dougherty. Feminism confronts
homo economicus: gender, law, and society. Cornell University
Press, 2018.
[FN20] Marianne A Ferber and Julie A Nelson. Feminist economics today:
Beyond economic man. University of Chicago Press, 2020.
[Hec18] Lori Anne Heckbert. Closing the gender gap in corporate advance-
ment: Insights and solutions from behavioral economics. Windsor
Yearbook of Access to Justice, 35:187–225, 2018.
[Hic14] Eleanore Hickman. Boardroom gender diversity: A behavioural
economics analysis. Journal of Corporate Law Studies, 14(2):385–
, 2014.
[KKT+91a] Daniel Kahneman, Jack L Knetsch, Richard H Thaler, et al. The
endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias. Journal of
Economic perspectives, 5(1):193–206, 1991.
[KKT+91b] Daniel Kahneman, Jack L Knetsch, Richard H Thaler, et al. The
endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias. Journal of
Economic perspectives, 5(1):193–206, 1991.
[Off19] International Labour Office. Women in business and management:
The business case for change. Geneva: ILO, 2019.
[Orr21] David Orrell. Behavioural economics: Psychology, neuroscience,
and the human side of economics. Palgrave Macmillan, 2021.
[RG21] Laurie A Rudman and Peter Glick. The Social Psychology of gen-
der: How Power and intimacy shape gender relations. Guilford
Publications, 2021.
[RXH] Yufei Ren, Lin Xiu, and Amy B Hietapelto. Gender differences in
asking for pay raises: The role of explicit rules.
[SMLL96] Virginia E Schein, Ruediger Mueller, Terri Lituchy, and Jiang Liu.
Think manager—think male: A global phenomenon? Journal of
organizational behavior, 17(1):33–41, 1996.
[Tha15] Richard H Thaler. Misbehaving: The making of behavioral eco-
nomics. WW Norton & Company, 2015.
Downloads
Posted
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Jumaina Fatima
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The copyright holder for this article has granted JSR.org a license to display the article in perpetuity.
