Preprint / Version 1

The WHO Is Not The Global Health Government States Think It Is

##article.authors##

  • Dilay Kuyucak

Keywords:

WHO, Global Health Government

Abstract

With the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, the World Health Organization was put in the center of the discussion surrounding the global response. States criticized the organization for its slow and insufficient response and leniency towards the Chinese government. This paper argues that the World Health Organization was unjustly criticized and delegitimized for three reasons: (1) unwillingness of member states to cooperate and the WHO’s lack of authority to ensure compliance; (2) misunderstanding – by states as well as the WHO itself – of the WHO’s founding mission and its current role as an international organization; (3) the lacking capacity of states and national healthcare systems to face a pandemic due to the privatization of health related industries. It suggests that more authority be given to the organization to ensure accurate and independent decision-making.

References or Bibliography

[BB22] Josephine Borghi and Garrett W. Brown. Taking systems thinking

to the global level: Using the who building blocks to describe and

appraise the global health system in relation to covid-19. Global

Policy, 2022.

[Ben20] Eyal Benvenisti. The who—destined to fail?: political cooperation

and the covid-19 pandemic. American Journal of International Law,

[BO21] Andres Barkil-Oteo. Addressing covid-19 during times of competi-

tive politics and failed institutions. Journal of Global Health, 2021.

[BT21] Forrest RO Stewart LS D’Agostino M Gutierrez EP. Bernardo T,

Sobkowich KE et al. Collaborating in the time of covid-19: The

scope and scale of innovative responses to a global pandemic. JMIR

Public Health Surveill, 2021.

[CC20] Yu-Jie Chen and Jerome A. Cohen. Why does the who exclude

taiwan? Council on Foreign Relations, 2020.

[DB19] Kristina Daugirdas and Gian Luca Burci. Financing the world

health organization: what lessons for multilateralism? Interna-

tional Organizations Law Review 299, 2019.

[DM20] Laura Donnelly and Tom Morgan. Uk abandoned testing be-

cause system “could only cope with five coro-navirus cases

a week”. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/05/30/revealed-

test-trace-abandoned-system-could-cope-five-coronavirus, 30 May

[Don20] President donald j. trump’s letter to dr. tedros adhanom ghebreye-

sus. https://perma.cc/RYW8-XMGC, 2020.

[ea20] Cheryl Lin et al. Policy decisions and use of information technology

to fight coronavirus disease, taiwan. Emerging infectious diseases,

[Fid99] David P. Fidler. International law and global public health. Uni-

versity of Kansas Law Review, 1999.

[Hei20] Maas Heiko. We still need functioning multilateral-

ism in the 21st century. https://www.auswaertiges-

amt.de/en/newsroom/news/maas-who/2346304., 2020.

[HLH+20] David Hall, John Lister, Cat Hobbs, Pascale Robinson, and Chris

Jarvis. Privatised and unprepared: the nhs supply chain. Univer-

sity of Greenwich/We Own It, https://weownit.org.uk/privatised-

and-unprepared-nhs-supply-chain, 2020.

[Irw21] A Irwin. What it will take to vaccinate the world against covid-19.

Nature, 2021.

[MCF19] Theodore M. Brown Marcos Cueto and Elizabeth Fee. The world

health organization: A history. Cambridge University Press, 2019.

[Mel22] Margherita Melillo. The uneasy coexistence of expertise and politics

in the world health organization. INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZA-

TIONS LAW REVIEW, 2022.

[Pos20] The Washington Post. Trump administration sends letter

withdrawing us from world health organization over coron-

avirus response. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/trump-

united-states-withdrawal-world-health-organization-

coronavirus/2020/07/07/ae0a25e4-b550-11ea-9a1d-

d3db1cbe07cestory.html, 7July2020.

[PSH20] Victoria Pilkington, Mirjam Keestra Sarai, and Andrew Hill. Global

covid-19 vaccine inequity: failures in the first year of distribution

and potential solutions for the future. Frontiers in Public Health,

[Rus11] Simon Rushton. Global health security: security for whom? security

from what? Political Studies, 2011.

[SW20] A.D. So and J Woo. Reserving coronavirus disease 2019 vaccines

for global access: cross sectional analysis. BMJ, 2020.

[WHO20a] WHO. Who director-general’s opening remarks at the

media briefing on covid-19. https://www.who.int/director-

general/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening-remarks-

at-the-media-briefing-on-covid-19—11-march-2020, 11 March

[WHO20b] WHO. The access to covid-19 tools (act) accelerator.

https://www.who.int/initiatives/act-accelerator, 2020.

[WHO20c] WHO. Who director-general’s statement on ihr emergency commit-

tee on novel coronavirus (2019-ncov). https://www.who.int/director-

general/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-statement-on-ihr-

emergency-committee-on-novel-coronavirus-(2019-ncov), 30 Jan-

uary 2020.

[WHO20d] WHO. Covid-19 virtual press conference. www.bit.ly/3aNWqoI, 8

April 2020.

[Woo22] Woolhouse. The year the world went mad, 2022.

Downloads

Posted

10-25-2023