A Comparative Study of Nobel Prize Winners in Chemistry and Physics over a Century Focusing on Gender and Age

Authors

  • Jordan Smith Southern Arkansas University
  • Ganna Lyubartseva, PhD Southern Arkansas University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47611/jsr.v13i1.2389

Keywords:

Nobel Prize, chemistry, physics, women’s representation, age

Abstract

The Nobel Prize is considered as one of the most prestigious awards universally. In this study, we analyzed gender and age at the time of award in two areas of physical science, chemistry and physics. Based on data from 419 laureates, we were looking for trends over the time period of one hundred twenty-three years.  We divided this period in two parts: the twentieth century and twenty-first century. Then we compared data for Chemistry and Physics Nobel Prize groups looking for similarities and differences within each field and then compared one field to another. We primarily focused on three parameters: (i) representation of women among winners, (ii) average age of all laureates and (iii) ages of men and women award winners. Our analysis indicates that women in both areas are representing a small proportion of all Chemistry and Physics Nobel Prize winners. However, there is an upward trend in women representation from the past to present century in both fields. Overall “aging” appears to be not gender-specific for both Chemistry and Physics Nobel Prize laureates. Demographic data analysis revealed an interesting fact: on average, both chemistry and physics women laureates are younger than men.  Alfred Nobel in his will of 1895 designated the prize to “those who during the preceding year have conferred the greatest benefit to humankind.” Acknowledging the global significance of a Nobel Prize, we hope that our findings will motivate more girls and women to pursue science leading to a smaller gender gap in chemistry and physics.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References or Bibliography

All Nobel Prizes in Chemistry. NobelPrize.org. https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/lists/all-nobel-prizes-in-chemistry

All Nobel Prizes in Physics. NobelPrize.org. https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/lists/all-nobel-prizes-in-physics

An Insider/Outsider Journey: Life Reflections with Nobel Laureate Carolyn Bertozzi. American Chemical Society. Retrieved September 21, 2023, from https://www.acs.org/acs-webinars/library/bertozzi-life-reflections.html

Blau, D. M., & Weinberg, B. A. (2017). Why the US science and engineering workforce is aging rapidly. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 114(15), 3879–3884. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1611748114

Bureau, U. C. (2021, September 2). Women Making Gains in STEM Occupations but Still Underrepresented. The United States Census Bureau. https://www.census.gov/library/stories/2021/01/women-making-gains-in-stem-occupations-but-still-underrepresented.html

Ceci, S. J. (2018). Women in Academic Science: Experimental Findings From Hiring Studies. Educational Psychologist, 53(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2017.1396462

Ceci, S. J., & Williams, W. M. (2015). Women have substantial advantage in STEM faculty hiring, except when competing against more-accomplished men. Frontiers in Psychology, 6. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01532

Charlesworth, T. E. S., & Banaji, M. R. (2019). Gender in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics: Issues, Causes, Solutions. The Journal of Neuroscience, 39(37), 7228–7243. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0475-18.2019

Frances Arnold’s thoughts on winning the Nobel Prize. (2019, May 10). Catalyst Magazine. https://catalyst.berkeley.edu/2019/05/10/frances-arnolds-thoughts-on-winning-the-nobel-prize/

Gakidou, E., Cowling, K., Lozano, R., & Murray, C. J. (2010). Increased educational attainment and its effect on child mortality in 175 countries between 1970 and 2009: A systematic analysis. The Lancet, 376(9745), 959–974. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61257-3

Ghaffarzadegan, N., & Xu, R. (2018). Late retirement, early careers, and the aging of U.S. science and engineering professors. PLoS ONE, 13(12), e0208411. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208411

Halpern, D. F., Benbow, C. P., Geary, D. C., Gur, R. C., Hyde, J. S., & Gernsbacher, M. A. (2007). The Science of Sex Differences in Science and Mathematics. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 8(1), 1–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-1006.2007.00032.x

Kirkwood, T. B. L. (2017). Why and how are we living longer? Experimental Physiology, 102(9), Article 9. https://doi.org/10.1113/EP086205

Lerman, K., Yu, Y., Morstatter, F., & Pujara, J. (2022). Gendered citation patterns among the scientific elite. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(40), e2206070119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2206070119

Llorens, A., Tzovara, A., Bellier, L., Bhaya-Grossman, I., Bidet-Caulet, A., Chang, W. K., Cross, Z. R., Dominguez-Faus, R., Flinker, A., Fonken, Y., Gorenstein, M. A., Holdgraf, C., Hoy, C. W., Ivanova, M. V., Jimenez, R. T., Jun, S., Kam, J. WY., Kidd, C., Marcelle, E., … Dronkers, N. F. (2021). Gender bias in academia: A lifetime problem that needs solutions. Neuron, 109(13), 2047–2074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2021.06.002

Lyubartseva, G., & Arthur, C. (2022). Encouraging Trends in Chemistry Nobel Prize of the Twenty First Century: Lessons for Aspiring Women Students and Educators. Education, 143(1), 1–6.

Meho, L. I. (2022). Gender gap among highly cited researchers, 2014–2021. Quantitative Science Studies, 3(4), 1003–1023. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00218

Rørstad, K., & Aksnes, D. W. (2015). Publication rate expressed by age, gender and academic position – A large-scale analysis of Norwegian academic staff. Journal of Informetrics, 9(2), 317–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2015.02.003

Ross, M. B., Glennon, B. M., Murciano-Goroff, R., Berkes, E. G., Weinberg, B. A., & Lane, J. I. (2022). Women are credited less in science than men. Nature, 608(7921), Article 7921. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04966-w

Roy, M.-F., Guillopé, C., Cesa, M., Ivie, R., White, S., Mihaljevic, H., Santamaría, L., Kelly, R., Goos, M., Ponce Dawson, S., Gledhill, I., & Chiu, M.-H. (2020). A Global Approach to the Gender Gap in Mathematical, Computing, and Natural Sciences: How to Measure It, How to Reduce It? Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3882609

The Nobel Prize amounts. NobelPrize.org. https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/about/the-nobel-prize-amounts

Wang, M.-T., & Degol, J. L. (2017). Gender Gap in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM): Current Knowledge, Implications for Practice, Policy, and Future Directions. Educational Psychology Review, 29(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9355-x

Published

02-29-2024

How to Cite

Smith, J., & Lyubartseva, PhD, G. (2024). A Comparative Study of Nobel Prize Winners in Chemistry and Physics over a Century Focusing on Gender and Age. Journal of Student Research, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.47611/jsr.v13i1.2389

Issue

Section

Research Articles