The Effects of Color Alterations in Genetically Modified Organisms on College Students

Authors

  • Nathan Lee Advanced Technologies Academy
  • Soo Park Advanced Technologies Academy

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v13i3.7316

Keywords:

genetically modified organisms, color alteration, college students, nutrition, pineapple, tomato, rice, visual perception

Abstract

This study introduces a new aspect to the knowledge of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) that showcases changes in color (e.g., purple tomatoes, pink pineapples, and golden rice). It has been established that these specific GMOs can increase nutritional intake, but there is a gap in the consumers’ perceptions of these alterations. This research investigates how modifications that alter the color of food products affect consumer attitudes towards GMOs; it specifically focuses on the college student demographic (18-25), as they have shown significant dietary deficiencies. A survey study consisting of 50 participants (n = 50) was conducted using a Likert scale from 1-5 to rate college students’ perceptions of both unmodified and genetically modified foods. The medians of these two entities were later compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, revealing a statistically significant effect of color changes on consumer perceptions (z = -3.993, p < 0.001), with a calculated effect size of -0.56, displaying a moderate to large negative shift in perception. These results suggest that genetic modifications that alter food color can significantly impact consumer acceptance. This study not only contributes to our understanding of how modifications of physical characteristics influence consumer behavior but also suggests that the success of genetically modified food products may heavily depend on sensory perceptions. This has important implications for the development and marketing strategies of GMOs, and it emphasizes the need for careful consideration of consumer preferences in genetic engineering practices.

Downloads

References or Bibliography

American College Health Association. (2006). American College Health Association National College Health Assessment Spring 2005 Reference Group Data Report (Abridged). Journal of American College Health, 55(1), 5-16. https://www.acha.org/documents/ncha/JACH%20July%202006%20SP%2005%20Ref%20Grp.pdf

Brookes G. (2022). Farm income and production impacts from the use of genetically modified (GM) crop technology 1996-2020. GM crops & food, 13(1), 171–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/21645698.2022.2105626

Check, J. W., & Schutt, R. K. (2011). Research Methods in Education. SAGE Publications.

Chen, P., Pruysers, S., & Blais, J. (2021). The Dark Side of Politics: Participation and the Dark

Triad. Political Studies, 69(3), 577–601. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321720911566

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. SAGE Publications

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (n.d.). FAOSTAT. FAOSTAT. Retrieved December 11, 2023, from https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL

Franko, D. L., Cousineau, T. M., Trant, M., Green, T. C., Rancourt, D., Thompson, D., Ainscough, J., Mintz, L. B., & Ciccazzo, M. (2008). Motivation, self-efficacy, physical activity and nutrition in college students: randomized controlled trial of an internet-based education program. Preventive medicine, 47(4), 369–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.06.013

Gonsalves, D., & Ferreira, S. (2003). Transgenic papaya: A case for managing risks of papaya ringspot virus in Hawaii. Plant Health Progress, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1094/php-2003-1113-03-rv

Kim H. Y. (2014). Statistical notes for clinical researchers: Nonparametric statistical methods: 1. Nonparametric methods for comparing two groups. Restorative dentistry & endodontics, 39(3), 235–239. https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2014.39.3.235

Marone, D., Mastrangelo, A. M., & Borrelli, G. M. (2023). From Transgenesis to Genome Editing in Crop Improvement: Applications, Marketing, and Legal Issues. International journal of molecular sciences, 24(8), 7122. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24087122

Norris, M. L. (2015, August 10). Will GMOs Hurt My Body? The Public's Concerns and How Scientists Have Addressed Them - Science in the News. Science in the News. https://sitn.hms.harvard.edu/flash/2015/will-gmos-hurt-my-body/

Ponto J. (2015). Understanding and Evaluating Survey Research. Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology, 6(2), 168–171.

Rozas, P., Kessi-Pérez, E. I., & Martínez, C. (2022). Genetically modified organisms: adapting regulatory frameworks for evolving genome editing technologies. Biological research, 55(1), 31. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40659-022-00399-x

Schomaker, J., & Meeter, M. (2012). Novelty enhances visual perception. PloS one, 7(12), e50599. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0050599

Sohi, M., Pitesky, M., & Gendreau, J. (2023). Analyzing public sentiment toward GMOs via social media between 2019-2021. GM crops & food, 14(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/21645698.2023.2190294

Tang, G., Qin, J., Dolnikowski, G. G., Russell, R. M., & Grusak, M. A. (2009). Golden Rice is an effective source of vitamin A. The American journal of clinical nutrition, 89(6), 1776–1783. https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.2008.27119

Teferra T. F. (2021). Should we still worry about the safety of GMO foods? Why and why not? A review. Food science & nutrition, 9(9), 5324–5331. https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.2499

Wang, J. G., Huang, B. T., Huang, L., Zhang, X., He, P. P., & Chen, J. B. (2023). Prediction of extracapsular extension in prostate cancer using the Likert scale combined with clinical and pathological parameters. Frontiers in oncology, 13, 1229552. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1229552

Witzel, C., & Gegenfurtner, K. R. (2018). Color perception: Objects, constancy, and categories. Annual Review of Vision Science, 4(1), 475–499. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-vision-091517-034231

World Bank. (2022). Population, total - World | Data. World Bank Data. Retrieved December 11, 2023, from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.POP.TOTL?locations=1W

Wunderlich, S., & Gatto, K. A. (2015). Consumer perception of genetically modified organisms and sources of information. Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.), 6(6), 842–851. https://doi.org/10.3945/an.115.008870

Yue, Y. (2022). The story of the purple tomato — and why its success is a win for GM foods. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/the-story-of-the-purple-tomato-and-why-its-success-is-a-win-for-gm-foods-194107

Published

08-31-2024

How to Cite

Lee, N., & Park, S. (2024). The Effects of Color Alterations in Genetically Modified Organisms on College Students. Journal of Student Research, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v13i3.7316

Issue

Section

AP Capstone™ Research