The Effects of Deindividuation on Correctional Officer Identities, Behaviors, Empathy, and Relationships: A Mixed Method Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v13i3.7309Keywords:
Deindivduation, Correctional Facilities, Prison, Guards, Correctional Officers, Inmates, Antisocial Behavior, Identity, Empathy, Hivemind, PrisonizationAbstract
One of the most common misconceptions about the prison system is that the structure only affects one party, inmates. It is widely known that within the confinements of the prison system, inmates experience severe physiological and psychological effects, undergoing a process called deindividuation. However, what is not well known is how the other party of the prison system is affected by this process, guards. In this study, a mixed method was used to determine how deindividuation affects guards interpersonal vs intrapersonal relationships. A survey was sent out to a group of correctional officers, asking them questions from four different questionnaires on the four main factors that influence deindividuation, containing both a quantitative and qualitative section to the survey. Despite the contrasting results of the quantitative and qualitative sections, the main conclusion taken away from this study is that deindividuation has a minimal effect on guards behaviors, identities, empathy, and relationships, but not to a strong enough extent to show any clear changes in their survey results.
Downloads
References or Bibliography
APA Dictionary of Psychology. (n.d.). Dictionary.apa.org. https://dictionary.apa.org/objective-self-awareness
Ardnet, J. (2009). Thine Own Self: True Self-Concept Accessibility and Meaning in Life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4714566/
Banks, W. (2004). A Study of Prisoners and Guards in a Simulated Prison. ResearchGate, ResearchGate.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235356446_A_Study_of_Prisoners_and_Guards_in_a_Simulated_Prison
Beria, F. M., Vilanova, F., Costa, . B., & Koller, S. H. (2017). Deindividuation: From Le Bon to the social identity model of deindividuation effects. Cogent Psychology, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/23311908.2017.1308104
van Bommel, M., van Prooijen, J.-W., Elffers, H., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (2012). Be aware to care: Public self-awareness leads to a reversal of the bystander effect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(4), 926–930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.02.011
Bovasso, G. (1997). The Interaction of Depersonalization and Deindividuation. Journal of Social Distress and the Homeless, 6(3), 213–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02939566
Brennan, K. A., Waller, N. G., & Fraley, R. C. (2000). The experiences in close relationships-revised ... - The Fetzer Institute. Fetzer Institute. https://fetzer.org/sites/default/files/images/stories/pdf/selfmeasures/Attachment-ExperienceinCloseRelationshipsRevised.pdf
Chong, C. (2013). Inmate-to-inmate: Socialization, relationships, and community among incarcerated men. Berkeley Undergraduate Journal, 26(2). https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6469m059
Crossey, B. P., Atherton, G., & Cross, L. (2021). Lost in the crowd: Imagining walking in synchrony with a crowd increases affiliation and deindividuation. PloS One, 16(7), e0254017. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8301649/
Dowd, D. W. (1984). The Pit and the Pendulum: Correctional Law Reform from the Sixties into the Eighties.https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/vlr/vol29/iss1/1/
Haney, C. (2008). The Consequences of Prison Life: Notes on the New Psychology of Prison. ResearchGate, ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/288469179_The_consequences_of_prison_life_Notes_on_the_new_psychology_of_prison_effects
Haney, C. (2002). The Psychological Impact of Incarceration for Post-Prison Adjustment. Urban Sites, Urban Sites. https://aspe.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_legacy_files/42351/Haney.pdf
Haney, C., & Zimbardo, P. (1998). The Past and Future of U.S. Prison Policy. Twenty-Five Years After the Stanford Prison Experiment.” ResearchGate, ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/13586727_The_Past_and_Future_of_US_Prison_Policy_Twenty-Five_Years_After_the_Stanford_Prison_Experiment
Jason Warr. (2020). ‘always gotta be two mans’: Lifers, risk, rehabilitation, and narrative ... Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1462474518822487
John, P., & St, J. (2015). The San Quentin Six: How a Wig and a Handgun Sent a Prison into Chaos 44 Years Ago. Los Angeles Times. https://www.latimes.com/local/crime/la-me-san-quentin-six-retro-20150813-htmlstory.html
Kaufman, E. A., Puzia, M. E., Crowell, S. E., & Price, C. J. (2019). Replication of the self-concept and identity measure (SCIM) among a treatment-seeking sample. Identity (Mahwah, N.J.). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6786792/
Meade, B., & Steiner, B. (2013). Assessing the Relationship between Exposure to Violence and Inmate Maladjustment within and Across State Correctional Facilities. Office of Justice Programs. https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/243901.pdf
National Cancer Institute (2011). Www.cancer.gov. https://www.cancer.gov/publications/dictionaries/cancer-terms/def/recall-bias
Orr, D., & Paterline, B. A. (2016). Adaptation to Prison and Inmate Self-Concept - Researchgate. ResearchGate, ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/316530259_Adaptation_to_Prison_and_Inmate_Self-Concept
Reicher, S.D. (1987). (PDF) A Social Identity Model of Deindividuation Phenomena. (n.d.). ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/240237685_A_Social_Identity_Model_of_Deindividuation_Phenomena
Skowroński, B. (2022, October 5). Introduction and validation of the antisocial beliefs scale in a sample of Polish prisoners. Frontiers. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.991687/full
Spreng, R. N., McKinnon, M. C., Mar, R. A., & Levine, B. (2009, January). The Toronto Empathy Questionnaire: Scale Development and initial validation of a factor-analytic solution to multiple empathy measures. Journal of personality assessment. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2775495/
Stets, J. E., & Burke, P. J. (2014). Social comparison in identity theory. In Z. Krizan & F. X. Gibbons (Eds.), Communal Functions of Social Comparison (pp. 39–59). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281453269_Social_Comparison_in_Identity_Theory
Thomas, C. W. (1977). Prisonization and its consequences: An examination of socialization in a coercive setting. Sociological Focus, 10(1), 53–68. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20831027
U.S. Department of Labor. (revised 2023). Retrieved from https://www.dol.gov/agencies/ilab/our-work/workers-rights
Wheeler, S. (1961). Socialization in correctional communities. American Sociological Review, 26(5), 697. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2090199?origin=crossref
Zimbardo, P.G. (1969) The Human Choice Individuation Reason and Order versus Deindividuation Impulse and Chaos. In Arnold, W.J. and Devine, D., Eds., Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, Vol. 17, University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, 237-307. - References - Scientific Research Publishing. (n.d.). Www.scirp.org. https://www.scirp.org/reference/ReferencesPapers?ReferenceID=2192577
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2024 Mai Haller; Emily van Sebille, Molly McNinch
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright holder(s) granted JSR a perpetual, non-exclusive license to distriute & display this article.
