Exploring the Roots of GMO Disapproval: Cognitive, Emotional, and Institutional Factors
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v13i3.7215Keywords:
cognitive bias, agriculture, GMOAbstract
This essay examines the complex public perceptions of GMOs, underlining how cognitive biases, emotional responses, and societal trust shape acceptance or rejection towards it. The study also highlights the significant role of emotions, such as fear and disgust, in overshadowing empirical evidence. It suggests that the media’s amplification of GMO risks and the lack of trust in scientific institutions further complicate public attitudes. By addressing these factors and enhancing transparent communication, the essay suggests pathways to develop more informed discourse on GMOs. Future research should therefore focus on cross-cultural comparison and longitudinal studies in order to understand evolving societal norms and improve public understanding.
Downloads
References or Bibliography
Ali, S., Nawaz, M. A., Ghufran, M., Hussain, S. N., & Hussein Mohammed, A. S. (2020). GM trust shaped by trust determinants with the impact of risk/benefit framework: the contingent role of food technology neophobia. GM Crops & Food, 12(1), 170–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/21645698.2020.1848230.
Bawa, A. S., & Anilakumar, K. R. (2013). Genetically Modified foods: safety, Risks and Public Concerns—a Review. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 50(6), 1035–1046. National Library of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-012-0899-1.
Boccia, F., Covino, D., & Sarnacchiaro, P. (2018). Genetically modified food versus knowledge and fear: A Noumenic approach for consumer behaviour. Food Research International, 111, 682–688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2018.06.013.
Frewer, L. J., Miles, S., & Marsh, R. (2002). The Media and Genetically Modified Foods: Evidence in Support of Social Amplification of Risk. Risk Analysis, 22(4), 701–711. https://doi.org/10.1111/0272-4332.00062.
Frewer, L. J., Scholderer, J., & Bredahl, L. (2003). Communicating about the Risks and Benefits of Genetically Modified Foods: The Mediating Role of Trust. Risk Analysis, 23(6), 1117–1133. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0272-4332.2003.00385.x.
Jang, S. M. (2013). Seeking Congruency or Incongruency Online? Examining Selective Exposure to Four Controversial Science Issues. Science Communication, 36(2), 143–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547013502733.
Klerck, D., & Sweeney, J. C. (2007). The effect of knowledge types on consumer-perceived risk and adoption of genetically modified foods. Psychology and Marketing, 24(2), 171–193. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20157.
Laros, F. J. M., & Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M. (2004). Importance of fear in the case of genetically modified food. Psychology and Marketing, 21(11), 889–908. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20039.
Liu, Y., Gao, F., & Zhu, Y. (2019). Why do intuitions differ? Explaining how individual and scenario features influence disgust and moral judgements on GMOs. Cultures of Science, 2(4), 293–309. https://doi.org/10.1177/209660831900200405.
McFadden, B. R., & Lusk, J. L. (2015). Cognitive biases in the assimilation of scientific information on global warming and genetically modified food. Food Policy, 54, 35–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2015.04.010.
Nicolia, A., Manzo, A., Veronesi, F., & Rosellini, D. (2014). An overview of the last 10 years of genetically engineered crop safety research. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology, 34(1), 77–88. https://doi.org/10.3109/07388551.2013.823595.
Pew Research Center. (2016, December). The New Food Fights: U.S. Public Divides Over Food Science. Pew Research Center Science & Society; Pew Research Center Science & Society. https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2016/12/01/the-new-food-fights/.
Phillips, D. M., & Hallman, W. K. (2013). Consumer Risk Perceptions and Marketing Strategy: The Case of Genetically Modified Food. Psychology & Marketing, 30(9), 739–748. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20642.
Pribic, L. (2017). Barriers to Building Trust when Communicating about Agricultural Biotechnology: The Role of Confirmation Bias [Graduate dissertation, University of Guelph]. The Atrium. https://atrium.lib.uoguelph.ca/items/f705ddd3-c9fd-49a5-a703-30c9c6fec3ae.
Royzman, E., F. Leeman, R., & Cusimano, C. (2017). What lies beneath? Fear vs. disgust as affective predictors of absolutist opposition to genetically modified food and other new technologies. Judgment and Decision Making, 12(5), 466–480. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1930297500006495.
Sohi, M., Pitesky, M., & Gendreau, J. (2023). Analyzing public sentiment toward GMOs via social media between 2019-2021. GM Crops & Food, 14(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/21645698.2023.2190294.
Siddiqui, S. A., Asif, Z., Murid, M., Fernando, I., Adli, D. N., Blinov, A. V., Golik, A. B., Nugraha, W. S., Ibrahim, S. A., & Jafari, S. M. (2022). Consumer Social and Psychological Factors Influencing the Use of Genetically Modified Foods—A Review. Sustainability, 14(23), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142315884.
Townsend, E., Clarke, D. D., & Travis, B. (2004). Effects of Context and Feelings on Perceptions of Genetically Modified Food. Risk Analysis, 24(5), 1369–1384. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00532.x.
Weasel, L. H. (2008). Food Fray: Inside the Controversy over Genetically Modified Food. AMACOM Div American Mgmt Assn.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2024 Stella Lee; Murdock
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright holder(s) granted JSR a perpetual, non-exclusive license to distriute & display this article.
