Evaluation of object detection capabilities of autonomous vehicles in harsh weather conditions

Authors

  • Pranay Ranjan Noah Curran
  • Noah Curran

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v13i3.6982

Keywords:

AI, Computer Vision, Deep Learning, Autonomous Vehicles

Abstract

In the last 20 years, we have witnessed significant advancements in the research on autonomous vehicles (AVs), but challenges remain in their global usage and adoption. According to government data, most AV testing in North America occurs in the desert areas of the southern US where weather challenges are minimal. Little test data is available from areas which encounter harsh weather (e.g., snow, heavy rain, dense fog). Given that object detection is a critical functional requirement for AVs, in this paper, we examine the effectiveness of object detection capabilities of AVs in harsh weather. The first part of our hypothesis is that industry-leading models, mostly trained on datasets from normal weather conditions, will not perform well in detecting objects in harsh weather. The second part of our hypothesis is that object detection accuracy should improve once these models are trained on harsh weather datasets. We used two industry leading models (Faster R-CNN and SSD) with KITTI (normal weather) and CADC (harsh weather) datasets for our research.  Our experiment shows that when trained with KITTI data, both models had an extremely low object detection precision on the CADC dataset, supporting the first part of our hypothesis. In addition, our experiment also shows significantly improved detection precision when these models were trained on the harsh weather dataset, thereby proving the second part of our hypothesis. These results are valuable suggestions to the AV industry as it works to expand the deployment of AVs to harsh weather areas in the future.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References or Bibliography

AV TEST Initiative | Automated Vehicle Tracking Tool | NHTSA. (n.d.). Retrieved January 29, 2024, from https://www.nhtsa.gov/automated-vehicle-test-tracking-tool

Dosovitskiy, A., Ros, G., Codevilla, F., Lopez, A., & Koltun, V. (2017). CARLA: An Open Urban Driving Simulator (arXiv:1711.03938). arXiv. http://arxiv.org/abs/1711.03938

Elmassik, Z., Sabry, M., & El Mougy, A. (2022). Understanding the Scene: Identifying the Proper Sensor Mix in Different Weather Conditions: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence, 785–792. https://doi.org/10.5220/0010911900003116

Fursa, I., Fandi, E., Musat, V., Culley, J., Gil, E., Teeti, I., Bilous, L., Sluis, I. V., Rast, A., & Bradley, A. (2021). Worsening Perception: Real-time Degradation of Autonomous Vehicle Perception Performance for Simulation of Adverse Weather Conditions (arXiv:2103.02760). arXiv. http://arxiv.org/abs/2103.02760

Geiger, A., Lenz, P., Stiller, C., & Urtasun, R. (2013). Vision meets robotics: The KITTI dataset. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 32(11), 1231–1237. https://doi.org/10.1177/0278364913491297

Liu, W., Anguelov, D., Erhan, D., Szegedy, C., Reed, S., Fu, C.-Y., & Berg, A. C. (2016). SSD: Single Shot MultiBox Detector (Vol. 9905, pp. 21–37). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46448-0_2

Padilla, R., Netto, S. L., & Da Silva, E. A. B. (2020). A Survey on Performance Metrics for Object-Detection Algorithms. 2020 International Conference on Systems, Signals and Image Processing (IWSSIP), 237–242. https://doi.org/10.1109/IWSSIP48289.2020.9145130

Pendleton, S., Andersen, H., Du, X., Shen, X., Meghjani, M., Eng, Y., Rus, D., & Ang, M. (2017). Perception, Planning, Control, and Coordination for Autonomous Vehicles. Machines, 5(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/machines5010006

Pitropov, M., Garcia, D., Rebello, J., Smart, M., Wang, C., Czarnecki, K., & Waslander, S. (2021). Canadian Adverse Driving Conditions Dataset. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 40(4–5), 681–690. https://doi.org/10.1177/0278364920979368

Ren, S., He, K., Girshick, R., & Sun, J. (2016). Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networks (arXiv:1506.01497). arXiv. http://arxiv.org/abs/1506.01497

Shah, S., Dey, D., Lovett, C., & Kapoor, A. (2017). AirSim: High-Fidelity Visual and Physical Simulation for Autonomous Vehicles (arXiv:1705.05065). arXiv. http://arxiv.org/abs/1705.05065

Shi, E., Gasser, T. M., Seeck, A., & Auerswald, R. (2020). The Principles of Operation Framework: A Comprehensive Classification Concept for Automated Driving Functions. SAE International Journal of Connected and Automated Vehicles, 3(1), 12-03-01–0003. https://doi.org/10.4271/12-03-01-0003

Stanley, B. (n.d.). Autonomous Vehicle Engineers Need to Solve the Weather Problem. Retrieved December 26, 2023, from https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/autonomous-vehicle-engineers-need-solve-byron-stanley

Zaidi, S. S. A., Ansari, M. S., Aslam, A., Kanwal, N., Asghar, M., & Lee, B. (2022). A survey of modern deep learning based object detection models. Digital Signal Processing, 126, 103514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsp.2022.103514

Zhang, Y., Carballo, A., Yang, H., & Takeda, K. (2023). Perception and sensing for autonomous vehicles under adverse weather conditions: A survey. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 196, 146–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2022.12.021

Zhou, X., Wang, D., & Krähenbühl, P. (2019). Objects as Points (arXiv:1904.07850). arXiv. http://arxiv.org/abs/1904.07850

Published

08-31-2024

How to Cite

Ranjan, P., & Curran, N. (2024). Evaluation of object detection capabilities of autonomous vehicles in harsh weather conditions. Journal of Student Research, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v13i3.6982

Issue

Section

HS Research Projects