Evaluation of object detection capabilities of autonomous vehicles in harsh weather conditions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v13i3.6982Keywords:
AI, Computer Vision, Deep Learning, Autonomous VehiclesAbstract
In the last 20 years, we have witnessed significant advancements in the research on autonomous vehicles (AVs), but challenges remain in their global usage and adoption. According to government data, most AV testing in North America occurs in the desert areas of the southern US where weather challenges are minimal. Little test data is available from areas which encounter harsh weather (e.g., snow, heavy rain, dense fog). Given that object detection is a critical functional requirement for AVs, in this paper, we examine the effectiveness of object detection capabilities of AVs in harsh weather. The first part of our hypothesis is that industry-leading models, mostly trained on datasets from normal weather conditions, will not perform well in detecting objects in harsh weather. The second part of our hypothesis is that object detection accuracy should improve once these models are trained on harsh weather datasets. We used two industry leading models (Faster R-CNN and SSD) with KITTI (normal weather) and CADC (harsh weather) datasets for our research. Our experiment shows that when trained with KITTI data, both models had an extremely low object detection precision on the CADC dataset, supporting the first part of our hypothesis. In addition, our experiment also shows significantly improved detection precision when these models were trained on the harsh weather dataset, thereby proving the second part of our hypothesis. These results are valuable suggestions to the AV industry as it works to expand the deployment of AVs to harsh weather areas in the future.
Downloads
References or Bibliography
AV TEST Initiative | Automated Vehicle Tracking Tool | NHTSA. (n.d.). Retrieved January 29, 2024, from https://www.nhtsa.gov/automated-vehicle-test-tracking-tool
Dosovitskiy, A., Ros, G., Codevilla, F., Lopez, A., & Koltun, V. (2017). CARLA: An Open Urban Driving Simulator (arXiv:1711.03938). arXiv. http://arxiv.org/abs/1711.03938
Elmassik, Z., Sabry, M., & El Mougy, A. (2022). Understanding the Scene: Identifying the Proper Sensor Mix in Different Weather Conditions: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence, 785–792. https://doi.org/10.5220/0010911900003116
Fursa, I., Fandi, E., Musat, V., Culley, J., Gil, E., Teeti, I., Bilous, L., Sluis, I. V., Rast, A., & Bradley, A. (2021). Worsening Perception: Real-time Degradation of Autonomous Vehicle Perception Performance for Simulation of Adverse Weather Conditions (arXiv:2103.02760). arXiv. http://arxiv.org/abs/2103.02760
Geiger, A., Lenz, P., Stiller, C., & Urtasun, R. (2013). Vision meets robotics: The KITTI dataset. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 32(11), 1231–1237. https://doi.org/10.1177/0278364913491297
Liu, W., Anguelov, D., Erhan, D., Szegedy, C., Reed, S., Fu, C.-Y., & Berg, A. C. (2016). SSD: Single Shot MultiBox Detector (Vol. 9905, pp. 21–37). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46448-0_2
Padilla, R., Netto, S. L., & Da Silva, E. A. B. (2020). A Survey on Performance Metrics for Object-Detection Algorithms. 2020 International Conference on Systems, Signals and Image Processing (IWSSIP), 237–242. https://doi.org/10.1109/IWSSIP48289.2020.9145130
Pendleton, S., Andersen, H., Du, X., Shen, X., Meghjani, M., Eng, Y., Rus, D., & Ang, M. (2017). Perception, Planning, Control, and Coordination for Autonomous Vehicles. Machines, 5(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/machines5010006
Pitropov, M., Garcia, D., Rebello, J., Smart, M., Wang, C., Czarnecki, K., & Waslander, S. (2021). Canadian Adverse Driving Conditions Dataset. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 40(4–5), 681–690. https://doi.org/10.1177/0278364920979368
Ren, S., He, K., Girshick, R., & Sun, J. (2016). Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networks (arXiv:1506.01497). arXiv. http://arxiv.org/abs/1506.01497
Shah, S., Dey, D., Lovett, C., & Kapoor, A. (2017). AirSim: High-Fidelity Visual and Physical Simulation for Autonomous Vehicles (arXiv:1705.05065). arXiv. http://arxiv.org/abs/1705.05065
Shi, E., Gasser, T. M., Seeck, A., & Auerswald, R. (2020). The Principles of Operation Framework: A Comprehensive Classification Concept for Automated Driving Functions. SAE International Journal of Connected and Automated Vehicles, 3(1), 12-03-01–0003. https://doi.org/10.4271/12-03-01-0003
Stanley, B. (n.d.). Autonomous Vehicle Engineers Need to Solve the Weather Problem. Retrieved December 26, 2023, from https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/autonomous-vehicle-engineers-need-solve-byron-stanley
Zaidi, S. S. A., Ansari, M. S., Aslam, A., Kanwal, N., Asghar, M., & Lee, B. (2022). A survey of modern deep learning based object detection models. Digital Signal Processing, 126, 103514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsp.2022.103514
Zhang, Y., Carballo, A., Yang, H., & Takeda, K. (2023). Perception and sensing for autonomous vehicles under adverse weather conditions: A survey. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 196, 146–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2022.12.021
Zhou, X., Wang, D., & Krähenbühl, P. (2019). Objects as Points (arXiv:1904.07850). arXiv. http://arxiv.org/abs/1904.07850
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2024 Pranay Ranjan; Noah Curran

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright holder(s) granted JSR a perpetual, non-exclusive license to distriute & display this article.