Diversity in Education: The U.S. Supreme Court Got It Wrong
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v13i1.6136Keywords:
diversity, affirmative action, educational outcomes, underrepresented, Equity, prejudice, higher education, Supreme Court, race, Fourteenth Amendment, college, underserved, admissions, diverse, racial, ethnic, cultural, inclusive, university, universities, colleges, undergraduate, stereotypes, socioeconomicAbstract
ABSTRACT
Diversity has repeatedly been shown to be a vital part of education. This paper explores the benefits and importance of diversity in education and presents studies and supporting research. In the case Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President and Fellows of Harvard College, the United States Supreme Court found that race-based affirmative action in college admissions is unconstitutional because it violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, which prohibits discrimination based on race. As colleges and universities are trying to be more inclusive and varied, the Supreme Court’s finding just made it more difficult for colleges to secure a diverse population which will hurt education and likely lead to an adverse outcome for society. Diversity has many important benefits and is especially advantageous in education. Diversity increases creativity, critical thinking, helps reduce achievement gaps, and improves academic performance, student motivation, and intellectual engagement. Increasing diversity can increase empathy, appreciation of other cultures, and can help create a sense of community on campus. It can also help create inclusive attitudes and respect for others, can aid in removing biases and stereotypes, and can help prepare students for careers in an increasingly interconnected world. When weighing the benefits of diversity against what is actually written in the law, it seems the 2023 U.S. Supreme Court made the wrong decision.
Downloads
References or Bibliography
References
Brenner, Sean. “How UCLA Has Responded to Proposition 209.” UCLA, UCLA, 23 Aug. 2023, newsroom.ucla.edu/releases/how-ucla-has-responded-to-proposition-209.
Saul, Stephanie. “9 States Have Banned Affirmative Action. Here’s What That Looks Like.” The New York Times, The New York Times, 31 Oct. 2022, www.nytimes.com/2022/10/31/us/politics/affirmative-action-ban-states.html.
“Why Is Critical Thinking Important?” FutureLearn, 25 Oct. 2022, www.futurelearn.com/info/courses/how-to-develop-critical-thinking-skills/0/steps/335512.
Gurin, Patricia, et al. “Diversity and Higher Education: Theory and Impact on Educational Outcomes.” Harvard Educational Review, vol. 72, no. 3, 1 Sept. 2002, pp. 330–367, https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.72.3.01151786u134n051.
Chang, Mitchell J., et al. “What Matters in College for Retaining Aspiring Scientists and Engineers from Underrepresented Racial Groups.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol. 51, no. 5, 18 Feb. 2014, pp. 555–580, https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21146.
Phillips, Jean M., and Stanley M. Gully. “Role of Goal Orientation, Ability, Need for Achievement, and Locus of Control in the Self-Efficacy and Goal--Setting Process.” Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 82, no. 5, Oct. 1997, pp. 792–802, https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.82.5.792.
Mannix, Elizabeth, and Margaret A. Neale. “What Differences Make a Difference? The Promise and Reality of Diverse Teams in Organizations.” Psychological Science in the Public Interest, vol. 6, no. 2, Oct. 2005, pp. 31–55, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-1006.2005.00022.x.
Hong, Lu, and Scott E. Page. “Groups of Diverse Problem Solvers Can Outperform Groups of High-Ability Problem Solvers.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 101, no. 46, 8 Nov. 2004, pp. 16385–16389, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0403723101.
Homan, Astrid C., et al. “The Interplay of Diversity Training and Diversity Beliefs on Team Creativity in Nationality Diverse Teams.” Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 100, no. 5, 2015, pp. 1456–1467, https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000013.
Hurtado, Sylvia, Alma R Clayton-Pedersen, et al. “Enhancing Campus Climates for Racial/Ethnic Diversity: Educational Policy and Practice.” The Review of Higher Education, vol. 21, no. 3, 1998, pp. 279–302, https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.1998.0003.
Cheryan, Sapna, et al. “Ambient Belonging: How Stereotypical Cues Impact Gender Participation in Computer Science.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 97, no. 6, 2009, pp. 1045–1060, https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016239.
Gurin, Patricia, Biren (Ratnesh) Nagda, et al. “The Benefits of Diversity in Education for Democratic Citizenship.” Journal of Social Issues, vol. 60, no. 1, 11 Feb. 2004, pp. 17–34, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-4537.2004.00097.x.
Reardon, Sean F., and Ximena A. Portilla. “Recent Trends in Income, Racial, and Ethnic School Readiness Gaps at Kindergarten Entry.” AERA Open, vol. 2, no. 3, 2016, p. 233285841665734, https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858416657343.
Johnson, David W., et al. “Cooperative Learning Returns to College What Evidence Is There That It Works?” Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, vol. 30, no. 4, July 1998, pp. 26–35, https://doi.org/10.1080/00091389809602629.
Page-Gould, Elizabeth, et al. “With a Little Help from My Cross-Group Friend: Reducing Anxiety in Intergroup Contexts through Cross-Group Friendship.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 95, no. 5, 2008, pp. 1080–1094, https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.95.5.1080.
Pettigrew, Thomas F., and Linda R. Tropp. “How Does Intergroup Contact Reduce Prejudice? Meta-Analytic Tests of Three Mediators.” European Journal of Social Psychology, vol. 38, no. 6, 5 Mar. 2008, pp. 922–934, https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.504.
Gurin, Patricia, et al. “Diversity and Higher Education: Theory and Impact on Educational Outcomes.” Harvard Educational Review, vol. 72, no. 3, 1 Sept. 2002, pp. 330–367, https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.72.3.01151786u134n051.
Roccas, Sonia, et al. “Toward a Unifying Model of Identification with Groups: Integrating Theoretical Perspectives.” Personality and Social Psychology Review, vol. 12, no. 3, 1 Aug. 2008, pp. 280–306, https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868308319225.
Ely, Robin J., and David A. Thomas. “Cultural Diversity at Work: The Effects of Diversity Perspectives on Work Group Processes and Outcomes.” Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 46, no. 2, June 2001, pp. 229–273, https://doi.org/10.2307/2667087.
Pettigrew, Thomas F., and Linda R. Tropp. “A Meta-Analytic Test of Intergroup Contact Theory.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 90, no. 5, 2006, pp. 751–783, https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751.
Dovidio, John F., Samuel L. Gaertner, and Tamar Saguy. “Commonality and the Complexity of ‘We’: Social Attitudes and Social Change.” Personality and Social Psychology Review, vol. 13, no. 1, 2009, pp. 3–20, https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868308326751.
Dovidio, John F., et al. “Intergroup Contact: The Past, Present, and the Future.” Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, vol. 6, no. 1, Jan. 2003, pp. 5–21, https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430203006001009.
Putnam, Robert D. “E Pluribus Unum: Diversity and Community in the Twenty-First Century the 2006 Johan Skytte Prize Lecture.” Scandinavian Political Studies, vol. 30, no. 2, June 2007, pp. 137–174, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9477.2007.00176.x.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2024 Ryan Downs; Dr. J
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright holder(s) granted JSR a perpetual, non-exclusive license to distriute & display this article.
