Environmental Justice for Children of Color: Energy Facility Pollution in Houston
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v12i4.5871Keywords:
environmental justice, houston, pollution, energy, energy facility, children of color, environmental inequality, school, survey, proximity analysisAbstract
Extensive prior research has been conducted on the imbalance between environmental hazards in majority-minority communities and majority-white communities and its negative physiological, psychological, and economic effects. This existing body of literature has suggested a positive correlation between environmental hazards and poor childhood development indicators. The study of the field is called “environmental justice”, founded on the belief that certain groups are disproportionately disadvantaged by negative environmental conditions induced by inequitable laws and policies. However, a clear correlation between environmental racism and minority childhood experiences has not been studied. This paper utilizes a proximity analysis between Houston-area schools and toxin-emitting energy facilities and survey-based research with a school community affected by such facilities in southeast Houston. Through this research, a clearer picture can be drawn of how policy and inaction have put children of color at a structural disadvantage over their wealthier, whiter counterparts. Results have established that urban development policies, the placement of energy production facilities, a lack of equitable urban planning boards, disinvestment in infrastructure, and carelessness by government officials have contributed to environmental inequality, with children being at a heightened risk of its negative effects. After assessing the findings of the inquiry concerning the negative developmental impacts of environmental inequality on children, future ramifications are discussed concerning suggestions for possible solutions.
Downloads
References or Bibliography
Ahlers, C. D. (2016). Race, ethnicity, and air pollution: New directions in environmental justice. Environmental Law, 46(4), 713–758. http://www.jstor.org/stable/44272868
Bullard, R. D. (1996). Environmental justice: it’s more than waste facility siting. Social Science Quarterly, 77(3), 493–499. http://www.jstor.org/stable/42863495
Bullard, R. D. (1993). The threat of environmental racism. Natural Resources & Environment, 7(3), 23–56. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40923229
Chamberlain, M. (2017). A quantitative analysis of environmental inequality in Houston, Texas. Digital Collections at Texas State University. Retrieved September 9, 2022, from https://digital.library.txstate.edu/handle/10877/8772
Gee, G. C., & Payne-Sturges, D. C. (2004). Environmental health disparities: A framework integrating psychosocial and environmental concepts. Environmental Health Perspectives, 112(17), 1645–1653. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3435896
Haberle, M. (2017). Fair housing and environmental justice: New strategies and challenges. Journal of Affordable Housing & Community Development Law, 26(2), 271–279. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26427358
Kane, J., Puentes, R. (2017). Flint's water crisis highlights the need for infrastructure investment and innovation. Brookings. Retrieved September 9, 2022, from https://www.brookings.edu/blog/the-avenue/2016/01/13/flints-water-crisis-highlights-need-for-infrastructure-investment-and-innovation/
Mascarenhas, M. J. (2016). Where the waters divide: Neoliberal racism, white privilege and environmental injustice. Race, Gender & Class, 23(3–4), 6–25. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26529206
Pulido, L. (2000). Rethinking environmental racism: White privilege and urban development in Southern California. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 90(1), 12–40. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1515377
Strife, S., & Downey, L. (2009). Childhood development and access to nature: A new direction for environmental inequality research. Organization & Environment, 22(1), 99–122. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26161998
Tillett, T. (2006). The cancer differential: Minorities in racially segregated urban areas at higher risk than whites. Environmental Health Perspectives, 114(3), A176–A177. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3436668
Union of Concerned Scientists. (2016). Double jeopardy in Houston: Acute and chronic chemical exposures pose disproportionate risks for marginalized communities. Union of Concerned Scientists. http://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep17254
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2023 Aditya Namjoshi; Dr. John D. Gresham
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright holder(s) granted JSR a perpetual, non-exclusive license to distriute & display this article.