Differentiated Instruction - Motivation and Academic Achievement Across Distinct Disciplines
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v12i4.5817Keywords:
Differentiated Instruction, Motivation, Academic Achievement, High School, English Classroom, Chemistry ClassroomAbstract
Differentiated instruction (DI) is gaining popularity as a pedagogical method/method of teaching, with the move towards inclusion. Research indicates that DI’s effects on student performance and engagement are significant and positive, though there are some inconsistencies when it comes to specific findings. This study sought to investigate the extent of the effects of DI on student academic performance and motivation across two courses from distinct disciplines - English and Chemistry - in a chosen international school in Beijing, China. The study adopted a quasi-experimental research design using a sample of 32 high school students. Anonymized data on motivation were collected using a validated researcher-developed Academic Motivation Scale (AMS), while academic achievement was measured by standardized testing scores. Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was used in analyzing and presenting data collected for the study. Results indicated that the differentiation was effective at increasing motivation to a statistically significant extent, in line with the literature. However, student academic performance as measured by test scores was not shown to have been significantly influenced by DI. It was also found that the effects of DI did not significantly differ between the two chosen courses. The results imply that in this study, DI’s superiority in one particular subject/discipline has not yet been established, but future studies can be conducted in a more substantial time frame which may potentially lead to more significant results.
Downloads
References or Bibliography
Charms, R. de. (2013). Personal Causation: The Internal Affective Determinants of Behavior. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315825632
Cheng, H.-Y., & Ding, Q.-T. (2021). Examining the behavioral features of Chinese teachers and students in the learner-centered instruction. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 36(1), 169–186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-020-00469-2
Cohen, L. (2018). Research Methods in Education.
Crowder, I. G. (2011). Teachers’ Perceptions and Practices of Differentiated Instruction at an Innovative Middle School for Gifted and Talented Students. https://getd.libs.uga.edu/pdfs/crowder_isabelle_g_201108_phd.pdf
Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Rathunde, K. (1993). The measurement of flow in everyday life: Toward a theory of emergent motivation. Developmental perspectives on motivation (pp. 57-97). http://s3.amazonaws.com/docuum/attachments/2143/Flow%20Article.pdf?1240439317
Deci, E. L. (2009). Large-scale school reform as viewed from the self-determination theory perspective. Theory and Research in Education, 7(2), 244–252. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878509104329
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2013). Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. Springer Science & Business Media.
Ersel Kaymakamoglu, S. (2017). Teachers’ Beliefs, Perceived Practice and Actual Classroom Practice in Relation to Traditional (Teacher-Centered) and Constructivist (Learner-Centered) Teaching (Note 1). Journal of Education and Learning, 7(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v7n1p29
Fisher, C. D. (1978). The effects of personal control, competence, and extrinsic reward systems on intrinsic motivation. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 21(3), 273–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(78)90054-5
Guay, F., Ratelle, C. F., Roy, A., & Litalien, D. (2010). Academic self-concept, autonomous academic motivation, and academic achievement: Mediating and additive effects. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(6), 644–653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2010.08.001
Guay, F., Roy, A., & Valois, P. (2017). Teacher structure as a predictor of students’ perceived competence and autonomous motivation: The moderating role of differentiated instruction. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(2), 224–240. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12146
Jang, H., Reeve, J., Ryan, R. M., & Kim, A. (2009). Can self-determination theory explain what underlies the productive, satisfying learning experiences of collectivistically oriented Korean students? Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(3), 644–661. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014241
Koohang, A., Riley, L., Smith, T., & Schreurs, J. (2009). E-Learning and Constructivism: From Theory to Application. https://www.ijello.org/Volume5/IJELLOv5p091-109Koohang655.pdf
Leblebi̇ci̇er, B. (2020). Learning Through Differentiated Instruction: Aaction Research in an Academic English Class. https://etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12625003/index.pdf
Manivannan, Lavania Marsha & Faizah Bt Mohamad Nor. (2020). Barriers in Differentiated Instruction: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Journal of Critical Reviews, 7(06). https://doi.org/10.31838/jcr.07.06.51
Niemiec, C. P., & Ryan, R. M. (2009). Autonomy, competence, and relatedness in the classroom: Applying self-determination theory to educational practice. Theory and Research in Education, 7(2), 133–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878509104318
Onyishi, C. N., & Sefotho, M. M. (2020). Teachers’ Perspectives on the Use of Differentiated Instruction in Inclusive Classrooms: Implication for Teacher Education. International Journal of Higher Education, 9(6), 136. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v9n6p136
Owens-Cunningham, A. (2021). Teacher Perceptions on Using Differentiated Instructional Strategies in Middle School. https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=11947&context=dissertations
Pablico, J., Diack, M., & Lawson, A. (2017). Differentiated Instruction in the High School Science Classroom: Qualitative and Quantitative Analyses. https://www.academia.edu/34196680/Differentiated_Instruction_in_the_High_School_Science_Classroom_Qualitative_and_Quantitative_Analyses
Ph.D. Candidate, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an, China, [email protected], Ginja, T. G., Chen, X., & Prof., Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an, China, [email protected]. (2020). Teacher Educators’ Perspectives and Experiences towards Differentiated Instruction. International Journal of Instruction, 13(4), 781–798. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13448a
Pozas, M., Letzel, V., & Schneider, C. (2020). Teachers and differentiated instruction: Exploring differentiation practices to address student diversity. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 20(3), 217–230. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-3802.12481
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-Determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-Being. American Psychologist. https://selfdeterminationtheory.org/SDT/documents/2000_RyanDeci_SDT.pdf
Schreurs, J., & Dumbraveanu, R. (2014). A Shift from Teacher Centered to Learner Centered Approach. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy (IJEP), 4(3), 36. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v4i3.3395
Sesen, B. A., & Tarhan, L. (2011). Active-learning versus teacher-centered instruction for learning acids and bases. Research in Science & Technological Education, 29(2), 205–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2011.581630
Tomlinson, C. A. (2014). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners (2nd edition). ASCD.
Tomlinson, C. A., & Tomlinson, C. A. (2017). How to differentiate instruction in academically diverse classrooms (Third edition). ASCD.
Vallerand, R. J., Blais, M. R., Brirer, N. M., and Pelletier, L. G. (1989). Construction et validation de l'Echelle de Motivation en Education (EME) [Construction and validation of the Echelle de Motivation en Education (EME)]. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 21, 323-349. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0079855
Vallerand, R. J., & Blssonnette, R. (1992). Intrinsic, Extrinsic, and Amotivational Styles as Predictors of Behavior: A Prospective Study. Journal of Personality, 60(3), 599–620. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.tb00922.x
Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., Blais, M. R., Brière, N. M., Senécal, C. B., & Vallières, É. F. (n.d.). Academic Motivation Scale (AMS-HS 28) High School Version. https://www.lrcs.uqam.ca/wpcontent/uploads/2017/08/HS-emes_en.pdf
Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., Blais, M. R., Briere, N. M., Senecal, C., & Vallieres, E. F. (1992). The Academic Motivation Scale: A Measure of Intrinsic, Extrinsic, and Amotivation in Education. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52(4), 1003–1017. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164492052004025
Zohrabi, M., Torabi, M. A., & Baybourdiani, P. (2012). Teacher-centered and/or Student- centered Learning:English Language in Iran. English Language and Literature Studies, 2(3), p18. https://doi.org/10.5539/ells.v2n3p18
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2023 Yuhui Chenyang
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright holder(s) granted JSR a perpetual, non-exclusive license to distriute & display this article.
