Exploring the Role of Interaction in Engagement and Satisfaction Within Virtual Learning Environments
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v12i3.5014Keywords:
engagement, interaction, satisfaction, virtual learning environment, secondary school studentsAbstract
Empirical studies have recognized the significant role of student engagement and interaction in determining satisfaction within high-quality, synchronous virtual learning environments. A prevailing concept in research surrounding synchronous virtual satisfaction suggests that interaction is a key driver of learner engagement. However, very few research has delved into the underpinnings of this relationship. This study, therefore, aims to examine the potential mechanisms that link student engagement and satisfaction through interactions within a synchronous virtual learning environment. A sample of 200 South Korean secondary school students, comprising a balanced gender ratio (51% male, 49% female), was included in this research. The findings demonstrate a series of positive correlations among student engagement, interaction, and satisfaction. Furthermore, mediation analysis revealed a positive relationship between student engagement and satisfaction, with interaction serving as a mediating variable. The study's results suggest that high school students derive benefits when teachers take active steps to engage them. The findings of this study could guide future planners of synchronous virtual learning environments to prioritize student engagement as a strategic initiative for boosting satisfaction levels.
Downloads
References or Bibliography
Archambault, I., Janosz, M., Fallu, J-S., & Pagani, L.S. (2019). Student engagement and its relationship with early high school dropout, Journal of Adolescence, 32(3), 651–670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2008.06.007
Azvedo, R. (2015). Defining and measuring engagement and learning in science: Conceptual, theoretical, methodological, and analytical issues, Educational Psychologist, 50(1), 84–94. https://doi:10.1080/00461520.2015.1004069.
Baloran, E.T.; Hernan, J.T., & Taoy, J.S. (2021). Course satisfaction and student engagement in online learning amid COVID-19 pandemic: A structural equation model, Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 22(4), 1–12.
Banna, J., G. Lin, M.-F., Stewart, M. & Fialkowski, M. K. (2015). Interaction matters: Strategies to promote engaged learning in an online introductory nutrition course, Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 11(2), 249–261.
Bayrak, F., Moanes, M. H., & Altun, A. (2020). Development of online course satisfaction scale, Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 21(4), 110-124.
Carliner, S. (2004). An overview of online learning, 2nd ed. Human Resource Development Press.
Conrad, D. (2002). Deep in the hearts of learners: Insights into the nature of online community, MERLOT Journal of Distance Education, 17(1), 1−19. https://jolt.merlot.org/vol10no2/croxton_0614.pdf
Croxton, R. (2014). The role of interactivity in student satisfaction and persistence in online learning, Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 10(2), pp. 1–12.
Dillenbourg, P., Schneider, D., & Synteta, P. (2002). “Information & Communication Technologies in Education” in Virtual Learning Environments in Proceedings of the 3rd Hellenic Conference, pp. 3-18, Kastaniotis Editions, Greece.
Dixson, M. D. (2015). Measuring Student Engagement in the Online Course: The Online Student Engagement Scale (OSE), Online Learning, 19(4), 1–15.
Fredricks, J., Blumenfeld, P. & Paris, A. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence, Review of Educational Research Spring, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059.
Hamutoglu, N. B., Gemikonakli, O. G., Duman, I., Kirksekiz, A., & Kiyici, M. (2019). Evaluating students experiences using a virtual learning environment: satisfaction and preferences, Education Technology Research Development, 68, 437–462.
Kuh, G. D. (2003, March/April). What we are learning about student engagement from NSSE: Benchmarks for effective educational practices, Changes, 24–32.
Handelsman, M. M., Briggs, W. L., Sullivan, N., & Towler, A. (2005). A measure of college student course engagement, The Journal of Educational Research, 93(3), 184–191.
Hayes, A. F., & Preacher, K. J. (2014). Statistical mediation analysis with a multicategorical independent variable, British Journal of Mathematical & Statistical Psychology, 67(3), 451–470. https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12028.
Hew, K. F. (2016). Promoting engagement in online courses: What strategies can we learn from three highly rated MOOCS, British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(2), 320–341. https://doi:10.1111/bjet.12235
IBM Corp. (2020). IBM SPSS statistics for windows, version 27.0.
Marks, H. M. (2000). Student engagement in instructional activity: Patterns in the elementary, middle, and high school years, American Educational Research Journal, 37, 153–184. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312037001153.
Martin, F. & Bolliger, D. U. (2018). Engagement matters: Student perceptions on the importance of engagement strategies in the online learning environment, Online Learning, 22(1), 205–222. https://doi:10.24059/olj.v22i1.1092.
Moore, M. J. (1993). Three types of interaction, in Distance education theory, K. Harry, M. John, and D. Keegan, Eds., Routledge, 19–24.
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory, 3rd ed. The McGraw-Hill Companies.
Oraif, I., & Elyas, T. (2021). The Impact of COVID-19 on Learning: Investigating EFL Learners’ Engagement in Online Courses in Saudi Arabia, Education Sciences, 11(3), 99. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11030099
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models, Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879.
Robinson, J. (2011). Assessing the value of using an online discussion board for engaging students, Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, 10(1), 13–22. https://doi:10.3794/johlste.101.257
Vuopala, E., Hyvönen, P., & Järvelä, S. (2016). Interaction forms in successful collaborative learning in virtual learning environment, Active Learning in Higher Education, 1(71), 25–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787415616730
Wang, M.-T. T., Fredricks, J., Ye, F., Hofkens, T., & Linn, J. S. (2017). Conceptualization and assessment of adolescents’ engagement and disengagement in school, European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000431
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2023 Abe Shin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright holder(s) granted JSR a perpetual, non-exclusive license to distriute & display this article.
