A Case Study on the Efficacy and Usage of Assistive Technologies in Howard County Schools, MD
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v12i3.4987Keywords:
Assistive Technologies, Special Education, Howard County MD, Social Behavior, Emotional Behavior, Academic PerformanceAbstract
Assistive technology is equipment that is designed to improve the capabilities of students with disabilities. For many students with disabilities, these technologies enable essential life skills such as daily communication and independence inside and outside of the classroom. This study assesses the efficacy, usage, and implementation of assistive technology in Howard County Public Schools (HCPSS) in Maryland, in order to determine any potential barriers and deficiencies towards the effective implementation of the said devices. A voluntary sample of 59 members of 1200 HCPSS staff was asked questions about the assistive technologies used in the county, their effectiveness, potential barriers towards implementation, training given, and available resources. Responses generally indicated that assistive technologies were beneficial, with the 83% of respondents selecting 4 or 5 out of 5 for the effectiveness of assistive technologies in academic and social contexts. Respondents elaborated that technologies allowed students with severe disabilities to communicate, socialize, work independently, and improve reading and writing skills. On the other hand, drawbacks such as distractions and dependencies created by the technologies were noted. Respondents felt confident towards the resources and support provided by the county, noting an assistive technology department and specialists available for support. However, respondents commonly reported that they were under-trained, received only occasional, limited workshop sessions, and were constantly behind on training. Thus, recommendations were drafted to improve training and staff awareness towards assistive technologies, such as required comprehensive training sessions for special education staff and a universal assistive technology guide to be provided.
Downloads
References or Bibliography
Ahmad, F. (2015). Use of Assistive Technology in Inclusive Education: Making Room for Diverse Learning Needs. Transcience. https://www2.hu-berlin.de/transcience/Vol6_No2_62_77.pdf
Ahmed, A. (2018). Perceptions of Using Assistive Technology for Students with Disabilities in the Classroom. International Journal of Special Education. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1184079.pdf
Apple. (2023). iPad. https://www.apple.com/ipad-select/
Ayon. V.. & Dillon. A. (2021). Assistive technology in education. The International Journal of Information. Diversity. & Inclusion (IJIDI). 5(3). https://doi.org/10.33137/ijidi.v5i3.36136
Bureau, U. C. (2020). 2020 census results. United States Census. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/decennial-census/decade/2020/2020-census-results.html
Center on the Social and Emotional Foundations for Early Learning. (2006). Tips and ideas for making visuals to support young children with challenging behavior. Vanderbilt University. http://www.vanderbilt.edu/csefel/modules/module3b/ handout2.pdf
Copley. J. & Ziviani. J. (2004). Barriers to the use of assistive technology for children with multiple disabilities. Occupational Therapy International. 11: 229-243. https://doi.org/10.1002/oti.213
Day J. N.. & Huefner. D. S. (2003). Assistive technology: Legal issues for students with disabilities and their schools. Journal of Special Education Technology. 18(2). 23–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/016264340301800202
Deter K, Polsgrove L, Rieth H (1996). A survey of assistive technology applications in schools and recommendations for practice. Journal of Special Education Technology. XIII (2): 62-80
Fteiha, M. A. (2016) Effectiveness of assistive technology in enhancing language skills for children with autism. International Journal of Developmental Disabilities. https://doi.org/10.1080/20473869.2015.1136129
Hasselbring, T., & Bausch, M. (2005). Assistive technologies for reading. Educational Leadership, 63(4), 72-75. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/285808982_Assistive_technologies_for_reading
Hoppestad, B. S. (2007). Inadequacies in computer access using assistive technology devices in profoundly disabled individuals: An overview of the current literature. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 2(4), 189–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483100701249540
Howard County Public School System (2022). Schools. hcpss.org. https://www.hcpss.org/schools/#direct
Howard County Special Education Citizens Advisory Committee. Mission. https://howardcountysecac.com/#:~:text=There%20are%20approximately%2059%2C000%20students,have%20an%20IEP%20or%20504.
Howard County Public School System. (2023) Hybrid Adoption of FY 2023 Operating & Capital Budgets and FY 2024-2028 Capital Improvement Program Meeting of the Board of Education of Howard County https://hcpsstv.v3.swagit.com/videos/174597
Judge, S. (2000). Accessing and funding assistive technology for young children with disabilities. Early Childhood Education Journal, 28(2), 125-131. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1009507722653#citeas
Judge, S. L., & Lahm, E. A. (1998). Assistive technology applications for play, mobility, com- munication, and learning for young children with disabilities. In S. L. Judge, & H. P. Parette (Eds.), Assistive technology for young children with dis- abilities: A guide to family-centred services (pp. 16–44). Cambridge, MA: Brookline.
Koch, K. (2017). Stay in the box! Embedded assistive technology improves access for students with disabilities. Education Sciences, 7(4), 82. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci7040082
Nordström, T. Nilsson, S. Gustafson, S. & Svensson, I. (2019) Assistive technology applications for students with reading difficulties: special education teachers’ experiences and perceptions. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology. 14:8. 798-808. DOI: 10.1080/17483107.2018.1499142
Parette, H. P. and Peterson-Karlan, G. R. (2007) Facilitating Student Achievement with Assistive Technology. JSTOR. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23879844?read-now=1&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Parette, H. P., Stoner, J. B., & Watts, E. H. (2007). Benefits of assistive technology user groups for Early Childhood Education Professionals. Early Childhood Education Journal, 35(4), 313–319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-007-0211-6
Russell, J. N. & Hendershot, G. E. & LeClere, F. & Howie, L. J., & Adler, M. (1997). Trends and differential use of assistive technology devices: United States, 1994. National Library of Medicine. Advance data from vital and health statistics, 292, 1-10. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/13114931_Trends_and_Differential_Use_of_Assistive_Technology_Devices_United_States_1994
Sharpe. Michael Edward. (2010). Assistive Technology Attrition: Identifying Why Teachers Abandon Assistive Technologies. Nova Southeastern University. https://nsuworks.nova.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1300&context=gscis_etd
United States Congress. (1988). Public Law 100-407. S.2561 - Technology-Related Assistance for Individuals With Disabilities Act of 1988. Congress.gov. https://www.congress.gov/bill/100th-congress/senate-bill/2561/text
TouchChat. (2023). TouchChat Discover app. https://touchchatapp.com/
Watson. A. H.. Ito. M.. Smith. R. O.. & Andersen. L. T. (2010). Effect of assistive technology in a public school setting. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 64(1). 18–29. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.64.1.18
What is the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)? ADA National Network. https://adata.org/learn-about-ada
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2023 Daniel Bi; Callie Casper
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright holder(s) granted JSR a perpetual, non-exclusive license to distriute & display this article.
