Analyzing the Extent to Which School X Meets Sustainability Standards and Goals set by the School District
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v12i3.4968Keywords:
sustainability, case study, high school, comprehensive, Sustainability Assessment ToolAbstract
The intensifying consequences of global warming have recently led to an increase of sustainability assessment tools (SATs) and interest in sustainability testing within local communities, institutions, and schools. This paper analyzes whether School X meets the sustainability goals and standards set by the overarching School System XYZ, which oversees thirty-eight high schools including this one. In order to measure this, a case study methodology, in cooperation with the University of California San Bernardino’s High School Sustainability Assessment Questionnaire (HSSAQ), was used to determine whether the school is meeting requirements set by the county. Collection of data and completion of this survey by the researcher revealed that School X is meeting sustainability standards and goals set by School System XYZ to a small extent, as only about one third (1/3) of quantifiable questions in the HSSAQ were answered “yes,” meaning the school is meeting that specific sustainability standard. This data should enable School System XYZ to continue sustainability research in the future, specifically in secondary schools throughout the school system.
Downloads
References or Bibliography
AASHE. (2022, September 27). Stars, Sustainability Tracking Assessment & Rating System. The Sustainability Tracking, Assessment & Rating System. Retrieved May 1, 2023, from https://stars.aashe.org/
AASHE. (2020, July 17). Higher Education Sustainability Assessment Frameworks Compared. AASHE Stars. Retrieved May 1, 2023, from https://stars.aashe.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Higher-Education-Sustainability-Assessment-Frameworks-Compared.pdf
Alshuwaikhat, H. M., & Abubakar, I. (2008). An integrated approach to achieving campus sustainability: Assessment of the current Campus Environmental Management Practices. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(16), 1777–1785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2007.12.002
BCPS. (n.d.). Energy and Sustainability. Division of Business Services. Retrieved May 1, 2023, from https://bcpsbusinessservices.ss3.sharpschool.com/departments/facilities_management/facilities_support_services/energy_and_sustainability
Berzosa, A., Bernaldo, M. O., & Fernández-Sanchez, G. (2017, September 10). Sustainability assessment tools for higher education: An empirical comparative analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 161, 812-820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.194
Buytaert, V., Muys, B., Devriendt, N., Pelkmans, L., Kretzschmar, J.G., & Samson, R. (2011, October). Towards integrated sustainability assessment for energetic use of biomass: A state of the art evaluation of assessment tools. Elsevier, 15(8), 3918-3933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.07.036
Caeiro, S., Sandoval Hamón, L. A., Martins, R., & Bayas Aldaz, C. E. (2020). Sustainability Assessment and benchmarking in higher education institutions—A critical reflection. Sustainability, 12(2), 543. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12020543
Chandratilake, S. R., & Dias, W. P. S. (2015). Ratio based indicators and continuous score functions for better assessment of Building Sustainability. Energy, 83, 137–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.02.007
Crowe, S., Cresswell, K., Robertson, A., Huby, G., Avery, A., & Sheikh, A. (2011). The case study approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-11-100
EAUC. (n.d.). Audit Instrument for Sustainability in Higher Education (AISHE). Sustainability Exchange. Retrieved May 1, 2023, from https://www.sustainabilityexchange.ac.uk/audit-instrument-for-sustainability-in-higher-educ
Findler, F., Schönherr, N., Lozano, R., & Stacherl, B. (2018, December 22). Assessing the Impacts of Higher Education Institutions on Sustainable Development—An Analysis of Tools and Indicators. MDPI, 11(1)(59). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11010059
Gibson, R. B. (2006). Sustainability assessment: Basic components of a practical approach. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 24(3), 170–182. https://doi.org/10.3152/147154606781765147
Global Environmental Management Initiative (GEMI). (1996, March). ISO 14001 EMS Self-Assessment Checklist. Retrieved May 1, 2023, from https://growthorientedsustainableentrepreneurship.files.wordpress.com/2016/07/mn-iso-14001-ems-self-assessment-checklist.pdf
Jacquot, C. W. (2003). The sustainable school: A sustainability assessment questionnaire for high schools. Thesis Digitization Project, (2475), 65. CSUSB ScholarWorks. Retrieved April 26, 2023, from https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/etd-project/2475/
Maroochy Waterwatch Inc. Maroochy Waterwatch Inc RSS. (n.d.). Retrieved May 1, 2023, from https://www.maroochycatchmentcentre.org.au/catchment/?page_id=627
Nguyen, B. K., & Altan, H. (2011, December). Comparative Review of Five Sustainable Rating Systems. ResearchGate, 21, 376-386. 10.1016/j.proeng.2011.11.2029
Shriberg, M. (2002). Institutional assessment tools for sustainability in higher education: Strengths, weaknesses, and implications for practice and theory. Higher Education Policy, 15(2), 153–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0952-8733(02)00006-5
Tools. Sustainable Schools. (2022, November 7). Retrieved May 1, 2023, from https://sustainschools.org/resources/tools/
ULSF. (2009). Sustainability Assessment Questionnaire. ULSF. Retrieved May 1, 2023, from https://ulsf.org/sustainability-assessment-questionnaire/
United Nations. (n.d.). Sustainability. United Nations. Retrieved May 1, 2023, from https://www.un.org/en/academic-impact/sustainability
Urquiza Gómez, F., Sáez-Navarrete, C., Rencoret Lioi, S., & Ishanoglu Marzuca, V. (2015). Adaptable model for assessing sustainability in Higher Education. Journal of Cleaner Production, 107, 475–485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.07.047
Winston, A. (2022, January 6). Sustainable business went mainstream in 2021. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved May 1, 2023, from https://hbr.org/2021/12/sustainable-business-went-mainstream-in-2021
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2023 Rachel Rose
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright holder(s) granted JSR a perpetual, non-exclusive license to distriute & display this article.
