The Impact of Robinhood's Retail Investing App on Investor Psychology and Financial Markets

Authors

  • Zheyu Li St. Margarets
  • Sujata Bhatia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v12i3.4738

Keywords:

financial stability, meme stocks, retail investing, trading, volatility

Abstract

The pandemic has seen a dramatic rise in retail investing, with millions of individuals worldwide downloading trading apps such as Robinhood.  Such trading apps have provided unprecedented access to commission-free investing for all, regardless of investing experience and financial literacy.  This creates an ethical dilemma: while a moral society should provide universal access to opportunities for wealth accumulation, easy access to investing has the potential to do great harm to novice investors.  The GameStop frenzy of 2021 is a prime example of the damaging effects of risky investing decisions, both on individual novice investors and on financial markets overall.  In its November 2021 Financial Stability Report, the U.S. Federal Reserve specifically called out the dangers of social media-driven investing and speculation by retail investors, citing the hazards of market volatility for financial stability.  This research will examine the history of retail investing, the societal factors and existing inequities that have led to the rise of retail investing, and the impact of retail investing on investor psychology and decision-making. The research finds that retail investing encourages herd behavior and impulsive decision-making, and leads to more attention-induced trading and negative returns.  Retail investing also amplifies both positive and negative market movements. This research will then describe possible solutions to these challenges, to ensure stable and secure financial markets, wise financial decision-making on the part of individual investors, socially responsible and responsive trading apps, and ethical access to trading for all investors.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Sujata Bhatia

Sujata K. Bhatia, M.D., Ph.D., PE is a physician, bioengineer, and professionally licensed chemical engineer who serves on the teaching faculty of biomedical engineering at Harvard University. She is the Assistant Director for Undergraduate Studies in Biomedical Engineering at Harvard and an Associate of the Belfer Center's Science, Technology, and Globalization Project.

References or Bibliography

BARBER, B. R. A. D. M., HUANG, X. I. N. G., ODEAN, T. E. R. R. A. N. C. E., & SCHWARZ, C. H. R. I. S. T. O. P. H. E. R. (2022). Attention‐induced trading and returns: Evidence from Robinhood users. The Journal of Finance, 77(6), 3141–3190. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.13183

Battalio, R. H., & Loughran, T. (2007). Does payment for order flow to your broker help or hurt you? Journal of Business Ethics, 80(1), 37–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9445-x

Fan, R., Talavera, O., & Tran, V. (2019). Social Media Bots and stock markets. European Financial Management, 26(3), 753–777. https://doi.org/10.1111/eufm.12245

Hsieh, S.-F., Chan, C.-Y., & Wang, M.-C. (2020). Retail investor attention and herding behavior. Journal of Empirical Finance, 59, 109–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jempfin.2020.09.005

Klapper, L., & Lusardi, A. (2019). Financial Literacy and financial resilience: Evidence from around the world. Financial Management, 49(3), 589–614. https://doi.org/10.1111/fima.12283

Merli, M., & Roger, T. (2013). What drives the herding behavior of individual investors? SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2079701

Tymula, A., & Wang, X. (2020). Increased risk taking, not loss tolerance, drives adolescents’ propensity to gamble more under Peer Observation. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3634358

Published

08-31-2023

How to Cite

Li, Z., & Bhatia, S. (2023). The Impact of Robinhood’s Retail Investing App on Investor Psychology and Financial Markets. Journal of Student Research, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v12i3.4738

Issue

Section

HS Research Projects