Impact of Christian Ethics on Biotechnological Resilience within the 21st Century

Authors

  • Ava Miklos Tompkins High School

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v12i3.4643

Keywords:

biotechnology, religion, christianity

Abstract

Research into varying forms of scientific research and study involve a variety of different ethical and social perspectives in order to comprehensively understand the limits and boundaries the research can be implemented into general public usage. Within the field of biotechnology, there is an abundance of diverse responses due to its ability to alter a being's body both presently and within future generations, most of which emerging from religious denominations. In particular, Christian sects have shown a certain hesitancy towards scientific advancement and ideologies that violate their own beliefs, a pattern which has been illustrated since the 16 and 17th centuries with the introduction of the Scientific Revolution. However, different Christian branches may view the implementation of biotechnology with a more beneficial perspective than others, which is why it is important to understand whether the continued advancement of biotechnology is resilient against the ethical values of Christianity within contemporary society. The need of biotechnological advancement to develop resiliency towards the negative connotations Christian communities hold may see it fit to decrease over time due to an increasing popularity to view science as an ability to aid humans in different illnesses within younger generations. However, opportunities for Christian communities to learn scientific concepts is still important since efforts to successfully introduce the advantages of biotechnology may be obsolete if religious communities wish to adhere to their own beliefs.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References or Bibliography

Afolabi, M. O. S. (2019). Are Radical Genetic Enhancements a Type of Contemporary Edenic

Deception? American Journal of Bioethics, 19(7), 53–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2019.1618963

Danielson, D., & Graney, C. M. (2014). The Case Against Copernicus. Scientific American,

(1), 72–77. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26039736

Davis, J. J. (2004). Christian Reflections on the Genetic Revolution. Evangelical Review of

Theology, 28(1), 65–79.

https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=asn&AN=12284281&site=ehost-live

Delkeskamp-Hayes, C. (2012). Rethinking the Christian Bioethics of Human Germ Line Genetic

Engineering: A Postscript Against the Grain of Contemporary Distortions. Christian Bioethics: Non-Ecumenical Studies in Medical Morality, 18(2), 219–230. https://doi.org/10.1093/cb/cbs015

DiSilvestro, R. (2012). Three Christian Arguments Against Germline Engineering. Christian

Bioethics: Non-Ecumenical Studies in Medical Morality, 18(2), 201–218. https://doi.org/10.1093/cb/cbs019

Evans, J. H., & Hudson, K. (2007). Religion and Reproductive Genetics: Beyond Views of

Embryonic Life? Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 46(4), 565–581. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4622009

Grant, E. (1962). Late Medieval Thought, Copernicus, and the Scientific Revolution. Journal of

the History of Ideas, 23(2), 197–220. https://doi.org/10.2307/2708155

Ishak, M. S. B., & Haneef, S. S. S. (2014). Reproductive Technology: A Critical Analysis of

Theological Responses in Christianity and Islam. Zygon: Journal of Religion & Science, 49(2), 396–413. https://doi.org/10.1111/zygo.12097

Kalidasan, V., & Das, K. T. (2022). Playing God? Religious Perspectives on Manipulating the

Genome. Journal of Religion & Health, 61(4), 3192–3218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-022-01497-6

Lastochkina, M. (2012). Exactly How Should Christians Be Uneasy About Germ-line Genetic

Engineering? A Response to David Jones. Christian Bioethics: Non-Ecumenical Studies

in Medical Morality, 18(2), 163–170. https://doi.org/10.1093/cb/cbs020

Longest, K. C., & Smith, C. (2011). Conflicting or Compatible: Beliefs About Religion and

Science Among Emerging Adults in the United States. Sociological Forum, 26(4), 846–869. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41330898

Mandela, N. (1994). Chapter 6. In Long Walk to Freedom (pp. 13–14). Little Brown.

Rahill, G. J., Ganapati, N. E., Joshi, M., Bristol, B., Molé, A., Jean-Pierre, A., Dionne, A.,

& Benavides, M. (2016). In their own words: Resilience among Haitian survivors of the 2010 earthquake. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, 27(2), 580–603. https://doi.org/10.1353/hpu.2016.0100

Reiss, M. J. (2009). The Relationship between Evolutionary Biology and Religion. Evolution,

(7), 1934–1941. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40306267

Rheeder, R. A. L. (2014). An exploration of synthetic biology: A preliminary Christian ethical

assessment of the advantages and disadvantages of synthetic biology. In Die Skriflig, 48(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.4102/ids.v48i2.722

Wallace, W. A. (1983). Galileo’s Science and the Trial of 1633. The Wilson Quarterly (1976-),

(3), 154–164. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40256655

Watling, T. (2006). ‘Singing the Lord’s Song in a Strange Land’: A ‘Bio-Ethnography’ of

Christianity and Genetic Engineering in Scotland. Ecotheology: Journal of Religion, Nature & the Environment, 11(1), 76–102. https://doi.org/10.1558/ecot.2006.11.1.76

Published

08-31-2023

How to Cite

Miklos, A. (2023). Impact of Christian Ethics on Biotechnological Resilience within the 21st Century. Journal of Student Research, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v12i3.4643

Issue

Section

HS Essay