Can Multinational Enterprises be Taxed in an Egalitarian way?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v12i1.4190Keywords:
Multinational Enterprises (MNEs), Liberal Egalitarianism, Impure Welfarism, Taxation, International Tax ReformAbstract
Failure to properly tax multinational enterprises (MNEs) located in host states where their users are results in a loss of $155 billion annually. The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) introduced two reform pillars in 2021 to address this gap. The first pillar provides a new taxing framework to replace the current one (Digital Services Taxes). It offers new taxing authority to host states where the consumers are located. The second pillar establishes a base rate for corporate taxes worldwide. Although the OECD proposals are a welcome step in the right direction, they fall short because they need to strike the proper balance between autonomy and flexibility. This paper promotes a compromise between incompetent digital services taxes (DSTs) and redistributing taxing authority. The proposal here aims to establish parameters that host states can work within while preserving countries’ independence to determine their rates. To tax MNEs “appropriately” means striking this balance. The proposals in this paper are driven by liberal egalitarianism and impure welfare philosophies of taxation, which emphasize equal opportunity for more equitable MNE taxation and a more equitable world.
Downloads
References or Bibliography
Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development, ‘130 countries and jurisdictions join bold new framework for international tax reform’ (1 July 2021)
<https://www.oecd.org/newsroom/130-countries-and-jurisdictions-join-bold-new-framework-for-international-tax-reform.htm> accessed 22 October 2022
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Corporate Tax Statistics 3rd edn <https://www.oecd.org/tax/tax-policy/corporate-tax-statistics-third-edition.pdf> accessed 22 October 2022 Figure 17
Favourate Sebele-Mpofu, Eukeria Mashiri, Samantha Chantelle Schwartz, ‘An exposition of transfer pricing motives, strategies and their implementation in tax avoidance by MNEs in developing countries.’ (2001) 8 Cogent Business and Management 1
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, ‘Statement on a Two-Pullar Solution to Address the Tax Challenges Arising from the Digitisation of the Economy <https://www.oecd.org/tax/beps/statement-on-a-two-pillar-solution-to-address-the-tax-challenges-arising-from-the-digitalisation-of-the-economy-july-2021.pdf> accessed 22 October 2022
Gary Clyde Hufbauer and Megan Hogan, ‘How do Digital Services Taxes Work?’ Peterson Institute for International Economics <https://www.piie.com/research/piie-charts/how-do-digital-services-taxes-work> accessed 22 October 2022
Apoorva Lalwani, ‘OECD’s global tax deal: Its impact on India and the way forward’ Observer Research Foundation, 24 June 2022 <https://www.orfonline.org/expert-speak/oecds-global-tax-deal/>, accessed 22 October 2022
Alexander W. Cappelen and Bertil Tungodden, ‘Tax Policy and Fair Inequality’ in Martin O’Neill and Shepley Orr (eds) Taxation: Philosophical Perspectives (OUP 2018) 111
Ben Bramble, ‘Welfarism’ <https://philarchive.org/archive/BRAW-8> accessed 22 October 2022
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2023 Jacob Schneekloth, Leah Trueblood
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright holder(s) granted JSR a perpetual, non-exclusive license to distriute & display this article.