Variation in Student Achievement: Effects of NCLB on Standards-based Accountability in Arizona
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v12i1.4055Keywords:
No Child Left Behind, Arizona, Student Achievement, Education Policy, Accountability, Test Scores, School Ratings, FederalAbstract
Over the years, the United States government has assumed a larger role in educational policy. The No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) is one of the most notable examples of an increase in federal involvement in education. Through the creation of accountability systems, NCLB required states to test in reading and mathematics. Prior research has maintained that states with pre-existing test-based accountability remained relatively unchanged by the passage of the Act. States without test-based accountability measures pre-NCLB may have been more likely to be affected by its implementation (e.g., Arizona). In order to test this claim, I examined student achievement in Arizona pre-, during, and post-NCLB under AZ LEARNS and the A-F Accountability System over certain years (1996, 2000, 2005, 2009, and 2015). Through the use of data from the Nation’s Report Card and the Arizona Department of Education, I sought to answer two key questions: (1) How do Arizona’s achievement scores pre-, during, and post-NCLB compare to other accountability types? and (2) In what way do Arizona school ratings vary during and after NCLB? By conducting a series of independent sample t-tests, I compared Arizona’s state scale scores to states with moderate accountability, and I compared school ratings under the accountability systems. These analyses reject the null hypothesis that there is no significant difference associated with school ratings under the two accountability systems, therefore supporting the prior stated claim. The results offer insight into Arizona’s accountability and are valuable for future evidence-based policymaking.
Downloads
References or Bibliography
Arizona Department of Education (n.d.). AZ LEARNS Classifications For Maricopa County Schools. Retrieved from https://www.arizonaindicators.org/az-learns/
Arizona Department of Education (2012). AZ Learns and A-F Letter Grades. National Center on Assessment and Accountability for Special Education. Retrieved from https://www.ncaase.com/docs/AZ_Learns_and_A-F_Letter_Grades040512.pdf
Arizona Secretary of State. (2000). Proposition 301. Retrieved from https://apps.azsos.gov/election/2000/Info/pubpamphlet/english/prop301.htm
Arizona State Board of Education (2019). 2018-2019 A-F Letter Grades. Retrieved from https://azsbe.az.gov/f-school-letter-grades
Birman, B., Le Floch, K. C., & Klekotka, A. (2007). Evaluating teacher quality under no child left behind. https://doi.org/10.7249/RB9287
Blank, R. K. (2011). Closing the Achievement Gap for Economically Disadvantaged Students? Analyzing Change since No Child Left Behind Using State Assessments and the National Assessment of Educational Progress. Council of Chief State School Officers. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED518986.pdf
Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer, Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155-159. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.112.1.155
Combs, M. C., & Nicholas, S. E. (2012). The effect of Arizona language policies on Arizona Indigenous students. Language Policy, 11(1), 101-118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-011-9230-7
Dee, T. S., & Jacob, B. (2011). The impact of No Child Left Behind on student achievement. Journal of Policy Analysis and management, 30(3), 418-446. https://doi.org/10.3386/w15531
Desimone, L. M. (2013). Reform before NCLB. Phi Delta Kappan, 94(8), 59-61. https://doi.org/10.1177/00317217130940081
Garcia, D. R. (2008). Mixed Messages: American Indian Achievement Before and Since the Implementation of No Child Left Behind.
Journal of American Indian Education, 47(1), 136–154. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24398510
Garcia, E., Lawton, K., & Diniz de Figueiredo, E. H. (2010). Assessment of Young English Language Learners in Arizona: Questioning the Validity of the State Measure of English Proficiency. UCLA: The Civil Rights Project / Proyecto Derechos Civiles. Retrieved from https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6xx644b5
Hamilton, L. S., Stecher, B. M., Marsh, J. A., McCombs, J. S., Robyn, A., Russell, J. L., Naftel, S., & Barney, H. (2007). Standards-Based Accountability Under No Child Left Behind: Experiences of Teachers and Administrators in Three States (1st ed.). RAND Corporation. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7249/mg589nsf
Hamilton, L. S., Stecher, B. M., & Yuan, K. (2012). Standards-based accountability in the United States: Lessons learned and future directions. Education inquiry, 3(2), 149-170. https://doi.org/10.3402/edui.v3i2.22025
Hanushek, E. A., & Raymond, M. E. (2002). Lessons About the Design of State Accountability Systems. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED477342.pdf
Hanushek, E. A., & Raymond, M. E. (2005). Does school accountability lead to improved student performance?. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management: The Journal of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management, 24(2), 297-327. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.20091
how2stats. (2014, March 14). Independent Samples t-test - Writing Up Results [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WA7Ysxd-91E
Husband, T., & Hunt, C. (2015). A review of the empirical literature on No Child Left Behind from 2001 to 2010. Planning and Changing, 46(1/2), 212.
Jimenez-Castellanos, O., & Martinez, D. (2014). Arizona. Journal of Education Finance, 39(3), 247-249. https://www.muse.jhu.edu/article/539787.
Le Floch, K. C., Martinez, F., O'Day, J., Stecher, B., Taylor, J., & Cook, A. (2007). State and Local Implementation of the" No Child Left Behind Act." Volume III--Accountability under" NCLB" Interim Report. US Department of Education. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED499023.pdf
Legal Information Institute. (2001). No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. Cornell Law School. Retrieved from https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/no_child_left_behind_act_of_2001
Mawhinney, H. B. (2013). Reactive Sequences in the Evolution of Maryland’s Consequential Accountability Regime. Educational Policy, 27(2), 279–306. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904812472723
McKinney, S. (2008). An analysis of the influence of No Child Left Behind and Arizona Learns on middle-school principal leadership behaviors and responsibilities. The University of Arizona. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10150/194025
Milliman, S. (2016). Charter schools, enrollment size, and educational accountability: A preliminary Arizona analysis. Journal of School Choice, 10(1), 73-95. https://doi.org/10.1080/15582159.2015.1134238
Morel-Seytoux, S. (2009). Minority Student Progress Report 2009: A Snapshot of Arizona's Educational Achievement. Arizona Commission for Postsecondary Education. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED517262.pdf
Nelson, F. H., Rosenberg, B., & Van Meter, N. (2004). Charter School Achievement On The 2003 National Assessment Of Educational Progress. Education Policy Studies Laboratory, Arizona State University College of Education. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED483349.pdf
Olivant, K. F. (2015). “I am not a format”: Teachers’ experiences with fostering creativity in the era of accountability. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 29(1), 115-129. https://doi.org/10.1080/02568543.2014.978920
Peterson, P. E., & West, M. R. (Eds.). (2003). No Child Left Behind?: The Politics and Practice of School Accountability. Brookings Institution Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7864/j.ctvb6v789
Roberts, N. (n.d.). Black Arizonans Battling To Close The Education Achievement Gap. The Block. Retrieved from https://theblockcharlotte.com/27358/black-arizonans-battling-to-close-the-education-achievement-gap/
Ryan, J. E. (2004). The perverse incentives of the no child left behind act. NYUL Rev., 79, 932. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.476463
Schmider, E., Ziegler, M., Danay, E., Beyer, L., & Bühner, M. (2010). Is it really robust? Reinvestigating the robustness of ANOVA against violations of the normal distribution assumption. Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 6, 147-151. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-2241/a000016
Shin, E. (2022). No Child Left Behind Act: The Impact of Standards-based Accountability (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/2104/11875
Spees, L. P., Potochnick, S., & Perreira, K. M. (2016). The academic achievement of Limited English Proficient (LEP) youth in new and established immigrant states: Lessons from the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP). Education Policy Analysis Archives, 24. 99. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.24.2130
Spurrier, A., Alderman, C., O’Neal Schiess, J., & Rotherham, A. J. (2020). The impact of standards-based accountability. Washington, DC: Bellwether Education Partners. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED606418.pdf
Standerfer, L. A. (2004). Modifications of policy and practice in Arizona school districts in attempting to comply with No Child Left Behind and AZ LEARNS. Arizona State University.
Stullich, S., Eisner, E., & McCrary, J. (2007). National assessment of title I, final report: Volume I: Implementation. US Department of Education (National Center for Education Statistics Institute of Education Sciences, 2007), 1. Retrieved from https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/pdf/20084012_rev.pdf
Taylor, J., Stecher, B., O'Day, J., Naftel, S., & Le Floch, K. C. (2010). State and Local Implementation of the" No Child Left Behind Act". Volume IX--Accountability under" NCLB". US Department of Education. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED508912.pdf
The Nation’s Report Card. (2015). 2015 Mathematics Grades 4 and 8 Assessment Report Cards: Summary Data Tables for National and State Average Scores and Achievement Level Results. National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved from https://www.nationsreportcard.gov/reading_math_2015/files/2015_Results_Appendix_Math.pdf
The Nation's Report Card. (2019). NAEP State Profiles. National Assessment of Educational Progress. Retrieved from https://www.nationsreportcard.gov/profiles/stateprofile?chort=2&sub=MAT&sj=&sfj=NP&st=MN&year=2019R3
Tingey, R. A. (2009)."High-Stakes Testing Under The No Child Left Behind Act: How Has It Impacted School Culture?". Theses and Dissertations. 1864. Retrieved from https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/1864
US Department of Education. (1996). NAEP 1996 Mathematics: Report Card for the Nation and the States. National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/pdf/main1996/97488.pdf
US Department of Education. (2000). The Nation's Report Card: Mathematics 2000. National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/pdf/main2000/2001517.pdf
US Department of Education. (2002). Fact sheet on the major provisions of the conference report to HR 1, the No Child Left Behind Act. Retrieved from https://www2.ed.gov/nclb/overview/intro/factsheet.html
US Department of Education. (2005). The Nation's Report Card: Mathematics 2005. National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/pdf/main2005/2006453.pdf
US Department of Education. (2009). The Nation's Report Card: Mathematics 2009. National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/pdf/main2009/2010451.pdf
Wilgus, G. (2019). From a nation at risk to no child left behind to race to the top: The US response to global competition. In Investment in early childhood education in a globalized world (pp. 107-158). Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-60041-7_4
Winstead, L. (2011). The impact of NCLB and accountability on social studies: Teacher experiences and perceptions about teaching social studies. The Social Studies, 102(5), 221-227. https://doi.org/10.1080/00377996.2011.571567
Wright, W. E. (2007). Heritage language programs in the era of English-only and No Child Left Behind. Heritage Language Journal, 5(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.46538/hlj.5.1.1
Wright, W. E., & Choi, D. (2005). Voices from the Classroom: A Statewide Survey of Experienced Third-Grade English Language Learner Teachers on the Impact of Language and High-Stakes Testing Policies in Arizona. Language Policy Research Unit. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED508521.pdf
Wright, W. E., & Choi, D. (2006). The impact of language and high-stakes testing policies on elementary school English language learners in Arizona. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 14(13), 1-75. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v14n13.2006
Wronowski, M. L., & Urick, A. (2018). Examining the relationship of teacher perception of accountability and assessment policies on teacher turnover during NCLB. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 27(86). https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.27.3858
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2023 Avinash Thakur; Nicole Yates
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright holder(s) granted JSR a perpetual, non-exclusive license to distriute & display this article.
