The Impact of Online Learning on 7th Grade Students’ Perception of Engagement, Social Presence, and Satisfaction During the COVID-19 Pandemic
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v11i3.3685Keywords:
COVID-19, Online Learning, Engagement, Social Presence, Satisfaction, 7th Grade StudentsAbstract
Rapidly escalating COVID-19 cases have forced educational institutions to close their doors. In an effort to reduce the spread of the infectious disease, online learning was implemented for students, interrupting face-to-face education in schools. Studies suggest that students’ engagement, social presence, and satisfaction are crucial in the implementation of online learning. Therefore, the aim of this study was to analyze how online learning has impacted students’ perceived engagement, social presence, and satisfaction during the COVID-19 pandemic in a middle school in Anchorage, Alaska. A descriptive correlational research design was implemented in this study. Utilizing three Likert scale questionnaires, 7th grade students, with a sample size of 139, were questioned about their perceived engagement, social presence, and satisfaction with online learning during COVID-19. In addition, a Pearson correlation coefficient was employed to examine the correlation between the perceived outcomes of engagement, social presence, and satisfaction. The results indicate that the vast majority of students perceived themselves to have low levels of engagement, social presence, and satisfaction. Additionally, it was found that engagement and social presence greatly contribute to students’ overall satisfaction. Therefore, it is paramount that 7th grade educators implement well-structured online courses to promote engagement and communicate effectively with these students to improve their satisfaction with online learning.
Downloads
References or Bibliography
Abou-Khalil, V., Helou, S., Khalifé, E., Chen, M. A., Majumdar, R., & Ogata, H. (2021). Emergency Online Learning in Low-Resource Settings: Effective Student Engagement Strategies. Education Sciences, 11(1), 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11010024
Akcaoglu, M., & Lee, E. (2016). Increasing Social Presence in Online Learning through Small Group Discussions. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(3). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i3.2293
Alkhalaf, S., Nguyen, J., Nguyen, A., & Drew, S. (n.d.). Online learner satisfaction and collaborative learning. Remote Work and Collaboration, 495–507. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-1918-8.ch025
Bali, S., & Liu, M. C. (2018). Students’ perceptions toward online learning and face-to-face learning courses. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1108, 012094. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1108/1/012094
Bomia, L., Beluzo, L., Demeester, D., Elander, K., Johnson, M., & Sheldon, B. (1997). The Impact of Teaching Strategies on Intrinsic Motivation.
Bullen, M. (1998). Participation and critical thinking in online university distance education. Journal of distance education, 13, 1-32.
Cobb, S. C. (2009). Social presence and online learning: A current view from a research perspective. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 8(3)
Cojocariu, V.-M., Lazar, I., Nedeff, V., & Lazar, G. (2014). SWOT ANLYSIS of e-learning educational services from the perspective of their beneficiaries. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 1999–2003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.510
Comparison of social presence in voice-based and text-based asynchronous computer conferences. (2009). 2009 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1109/hicss.2009.119
Craig, A., Goold, A., Coldwell, J., & Mustard, J. (2008). Perceptions of roles and responsibilities in online learning: A case study. Proceedings of the 2008 InSITE Conference. https://doi.org/10.28945/3205
Czerkawski, B. C., & Lyman, E. W. (2016). An instructional design framework for fostering student engagement in online learning environments. TechTrends, 60(6), 532–539. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0110-z
Dewan, M. A., Murshed, M., & Lin, F. (2019). Engagement detection in online learning: A Review. Smart Learning Environments, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-018-0080-z
Dietz-Uhler, B., Fisher, A., &Han, A. (2007). Designing online courses to promote student retention. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 36(1), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.2190/et.36.1.g
Dixson, M. D. (2015). Measuring student engagement in the online course: The online student engagement scale (OSE). Online Learning, 19(4). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v19i4.561
Domenico, C., & Maurizio, V. (2020). Who declares COVID-19 a pandemic. Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis. Retrieved December 15, 2021, from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32191675/
Driscoll, A., Jicha, K., Hunt, A. N., Tichavsky, L., & Thompson, G. (2012). Can Online Courses Deliver In-class Results? Teaching Sociology, 40(4), 312–331. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092055x12446624
Dziuban, C., Moskal, P., Brophy, J., & Shea, P. (2019). Student satisfaction with Asynchronous Learning. Online Learning, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v11i1.1739
Dziuban, C., Moskal, P., Thompson, J., Kramer, L., DeCantis, G., & Hermsdorfer, A. (2015). Student satisfaction with online learning: Is it a psychological contract? Online Learning, 19(2). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v19i2.496
Dziuban, C., Moskal, P., Brophy-Ellison, J., & Shea, P. (2007). Technology-enhanced
education and millennial students in higher education. Metropolitan Universities, 18(3),
–90.
Dziuban, C. D., Wang, M. C., & Cook, I. J. (2004). Dr. Fox rocks: Student perceptions of excellent and poor college teaching. Unpublished manuscript, University of Central Florida
Elshami, W., Taha, M. H., Abuzaid, M., Saravanan, C., Al Kawas, S., & Abdalla, M. E. (2021). Satisfaction with online learning in the new normal: Perspective of students and faculty at Medical and Health Sciences Colleges. Medical Education Online, 26(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2021.1920090
Ferri, F., Grifoni, P., & Guzzo, T. (2020). Online learning and emergency remote teaching: Opportunities and challenges in emergency situations. Societies, 10(4), 86. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc10040086
Garratt-Reed D, Roberts LD and Heritage B (2016) Grades, Student Satisfaction and Retention in Online and Face-to-Face Introductory Psychology Units: A Test of Equivalency Theory. Front. Psychol. 7:673. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00673
Ginsberg, M. B., & Wlodkowski, R. J. (2009). Professional learning to promote motivation and academic performance among diverse adults. Learning Never Ends, 23.
Gray, J. A., & DiLoreto, M. (2016). The effects of student engagement, student satisfaction, and perceived learning in online learning environments. International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, 11(1), n1.
Gunawardena, C. (1995). Social Presence Theory and Implications for Interaction and Collaborative Learning in Computer Conferences. International journal of educational telecommunications, 1, 147-166.
Gunawardena, C. N., & Zittle, F. J. (1997). Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer‐mediated conferencing environment. American Journal of Distance Education, 11(3), 8–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923649709526970
Hiltz, S. R. (1994). The virtual classroom: Learning without limits via computer networks. Intellect Books.
Jaggars, S. S., Edgecombe, N., & Stacey, G. W. (2013). Creating an effective online presence. Effective Telementoring Partnerships in Digital Learning Environments, 1110–1574. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-1664-4.les3
Kauffman, H. (2015). A review of predictive factors of student success in and satisfaction with online learning. Research in Learning Technology, 23. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v23.26507
Ke, F., & Kwak, D. (2013). Constructs of student-centered online learning on learning satisfaction of a diverse online student body: A structural equation modeling approach. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 48(1), 97–122. https://doi.org/10.2190/ec.48.1.e
Layton, J.R. (1999). No Significant Difference Phenomenon. J. Educ. Technol. Soc., 2.
Lo, C. C. (2010). How student satisfaction factors affect perceived learning. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 47-54.
Lowry, P. B., Roberts, T. L., Romano, N. C., Cheney, P. D., & Hightower, R. T. (2006). The Impact of Group Size and Social Presence on Small-Group Communication. Small Group Research, 37(6), 631–661. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496406294322
Malasri, S. (2000). The McGraw-Hill Handbook of Distance Learning. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 126(1), 41–42. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)1052-3928(2000)126:1(41)
Mandernach, B. J., Donnelli-Sallee, E., & Dailey-Hebert, A. (2011). Assessing course student engagement. Promoting student engagement, 1, 277-281.
Maqsood, A., Abbas, J., Rehman, G., & Mubeen, R. (2021). The paradigm shift for educational system continuance in the advent of COVID-19 pandemic: Mental Health Challenges and reflections. Current Research in Behavioral Sciences, 2, 100011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crbeha.2020.100011
Martin, F., & Bolliger, D. U. (2018). Engagement matters: Student perceptions on the importance of engagement strategies in the Online Learning Environment. Online Learning, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i1.1092
Martin, F., Stamper, B., & Flowers, C. (2020). Examining student perception of readiness for online learning: Importance and confidence. Online Learning, 24(2). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v24i2.2053
Muilenburg, L. Y., & Berge, Z. L. (2005). Student barriers to online learning: A factor analytic study. Distance Education, 26(1), 29–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587910500081269
Mykota, D., & Duncan, R. (2007). Learner characteristics as predictors of online social presence [abstract]. Canadian Journal of Education / Revue Canadienne De L'éducation, 30(1), 157. https://doi.org/10.2307/20466630
Nambiar, Deepika. (2020). The impact of online learning during COVID-19: students' and teachers' perspective. The International Journal of Indian Psychology. 8. 10.25215/0802.094.
Natarajan, J., & Joseph, M. A. (2022, January). Impact of emergency remote teaching on nursing students’ engagement, social presence, and satisfaction during the COVID‐19 pandemic. In Nursing Forum (Vol. 57, No. 1, pp. 42-48).
Ndungu, N. E. (2009). Product review: Enhancing adult motivation to learn: A comprehensive guide for teaching all adults. Adult Learning, 20(3-4), 42–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/104515950902000314
Newman, F.M., Wehlage, G.G. and Lamborn, S.D. (1992) The Significance and Sources of Student Engagement. In: Newman, F.M., Ed., Student Engagement and Achievement in American Secondary Schools, Teachers College Press, New York, 11-39.
Perišić, V. (2012, April). Zappers in teaching mathematics. In Proceedings of the1st Annual Conference on the Aiming for Excellence in STEM Learning and Teaching (pp. 12-13).
Reio, T. G., & Crim, S. J. (2013). Social presence and student satisfaction as predictors of online enrollment intent. American Journal of Distance Education, 27(2), 122–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2013.775801
Richardson, J., & Swan, K. (2003). Examining social presence in online courses in relation to students’ perceived learning and satisfaction. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7, 68-88.
Richardson, J. C., & Swan, K. (2019). Examining social presence in online courses in relation to students' perceived learning and satisfaction. Online Learning, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v7i1.1864
Russell, V. J., Ainley, M., & Frydenberg, E. (2005). Student motivation and engagement. Schooling Issues Digest. Australian Government, Department of Education, Science and Training.
Schullery, N. M. (2013). Workplace engagement and generational differences in values. Business Communication Quarterly, 76(2), 252–265. https://doi.org/10.1177/1080569913476543
Simmons, L. K. (2010). Enhancing adult motivation to learn: A comprehensive guide for teaching all adults - by Raymond J. Wlodkowski. Teaching Theology & Religion, 13(2), 188–190. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9647.2010.00612.x
Song, L., Singleton, E. S., Hill, J. R., & Koh, M. H. (2004). Improving online learning: Student perceptions of useful and challenging characteristics. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(1), 59–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2003.11.003
Stankovska, G., Dimitrovski, D., Ibraimi, Z., & Memedi, I. (2021). Online Learning, Social Presence and Satisfaction among University Students during the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Strauss, V. (2020, March 27). 1.5 billion children around globe affected by school closure. what countries are doing to keep kids learning during pandemic. The Washington Post. Retrieved December 15, 2021, from https://www.washingtonpost.com/education/2020/03/26/nearly-14-billion-children-around-globe-are-out-school-heres-what-countries-are-doing-keep-kids-learning-during-pandemic/
Tu, C.-H. (2001). How Chinese perceive social presence: An examination of interaction in online learning environment. Educational Media International, 38(1), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523980010021235
Tu, C.-H., & McIsaac, M. (2002). The relationship of social presence and interaction in online classes. American Journal of Distance Education, 16(3), 131–150. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15389286ajde1603_2
Ward, M., & Newlands, D. (1998). Use of the web in undergraduate teaching. Computers & Education, 31(2), 171–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0360-1315(98)00024-4
Werang, B., & Radja Leba, S. M. (2022). Factors Affecting Student Engagement in Online Teaching and Learning: A Qualitative Case Study. The Qualitative Report. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2022.5165
Whiteside, A. L. (2015). Introducing the social presence model to explore online and blended learning experiences. Online Learning, 19(2). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v19i2.453
Zeedyk, M. S., Gallacher, J., Henderson, M., Hope, G., Husband, B., & Lindsay, K. (2003). Negotiating the transition from primary to Secondary School. School Psychology International, 24(1), 67–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034303024001010
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaedam Lee; Vani Pillai
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-sa/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright holder(s) granted JSR a perpetual, non-exclusive license to distriute & display this article.