Multidisciplinary Climate Change Education: Determining Effectiveness Through Comparative Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v11i3.3661Keywords:
climate change education, climate literacy, multidisciplinary education, comparative analysis, high school students, curriculum, Advanced Placement (AP), Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS)Abstract
Climate Change Education (CCE) is one of the most widely-recognized mitigative solutions to the climate crisis, but research suggests that most global and national CCE policies and curricula are ineffective. A reason for this is that existing CCE curriculum consists of purely science-based pedagogy, despite the fact that multiple studies suggest that a multidisciplinary approach—involving humanities and the arts rather than just science—would be more effective. A case study was conducted at a select California high school, and compared the effectiveness of multidisciplinary CCE to the existing, science-focused CCE, in terms of Climate Literacy (CL) outcomes in students. CL encompasses climate change knowledge, credibility assessment skills, communication skills, and climate-related behavior, four factors that are important determinants when evaluating CCE effectiveness. Using survey research and structured interviews, the CL of students who took 3 or greater Advanced Placement (AP) courses was compared to that of students who took less than 3 such courses. Involvement in Advanced Placement (AP) classes, college-level classes offered to students by the College Board, was used as an indicator of being exposed to multidisciplinary CCE, and was compared to the effects of the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) which are currently in use in California. The research found that CL within students was significantly greater in AP students in terms of climate change knowledge, credibility assessment, and communication; but climate-related behavior was low in both groups of students and did not seem to be affected by educational curriculum.
Downloads
References or Bibliography
About AP course audit. About AP Course Audit – AP Central | College Board. (n.d.). Retrieved August 30, 2022, from https://apcentral.collegeboard.org/courses/ap-course-audit/about
Anderson, A. (2012). Climate change education for mitigation and adaptation. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, 6(2), 191–206. https://doi.org/10.1177/0973408212475199
AP Program results. Reports. (n.d.). Retrieved August 30, 2022, from https://reports.collegeboard.org/ap-program-results
Ardoin, N. M., Bowers, A. W., Roth, N. W., & Holthuis, N. (2017). Environmental education and K-12 student outcomes: A Review and analysis of Research. The Journal of Environmental Education, 49(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2017.1366155
Chankrajang, T., & Muttarak, R. (2017). Green returns to education: Does schooling contribute to pro-environmental behaviours? evidence from Thailand. Ecological Economics, 131, 434–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.09.015
Choosing your AP courses. Choosing Your AP Courses – AP Students | College Board. (n.d.). Retrieved August 30, 2022, from https://apstudents.collegeboard.org/choosing-courses
Discover ap. Advanced Placement® (AP) – The College Board. (n.d.). Retrieved August 30, 2022, from https://ap.collegeboard.org/
Encyclopedia of Research Design. SAGE Research Methods. (2012, December 27). Retrieved August 30, 2022, from https://methods.sagepub.com/reference/encyc-of-research-design/n42.xml#:~:text=In%20causal%2Dcomparative%20research%2C%20the,effect%20on%20ACT%20test%20scores
The essential principles of climate literacy. NOAA Climate.gov. (n.d.). Retrieved August 30, 2022, from https://www.climate.gov/teaching/climate
Gerring, J. (2019). Case study research: Principles and practices. Cambridge University Press.
Hansen, P. J. (2009). Knowledge about the greenhouse effect and the effects of the ozone layer among Norwegian pupils finishing compulsory education in 1989, 1993, and 2005—what now? International Journal of Science Education, 32(3), 397–419. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802600787
Hens, L., & Stoyanov, S. (2014). Education for Climate Changes, Environmental Health and Environmental Justice. Journal of Chemical Technology & Metallurgy, 49(2), 194–208.
How your school can offer AP courses. How Your School Can Offer AP Courses – AP Central | College Board. (n.d.). Retrieved August 30, 2022, from https://apcentral.collegeboard.org/about-ap/launch-grow-ap-program/launch/how-your-school-can-offer-ap
Jarrett, L., Takacs, G., & Ferry, B. (2011). What scientific concepts are required to understand climate change? Retrieved 2022, from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/277170837_What_scientific_concepts_are_required_to_understand_climate_change
Læssøe, J. (2009, December). Climate Change and Sustainable Development: The Response from Education. Retrieved 2022, from https://dpu.au.dk/fileadmin/www.dpu.dk/viden/temaeraaa/klimaogmiljoepaedagogik/forskning_miljoe-og-sundhedspaedagogik_klimakonference-2009_20091210145855_dpu_recommendations.pdf
Meyer, A. (2015). Does education increase pro-environmental behavior? evidence from Europe. Ecological Economics, 116, 108–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.04.018
National Center for Science Education. (2020, October). Making the grade? - climategrades.org. Retrieved August 31, 2022, from https://climategrades.org/MakingTheGradeReport.pdf
Next generation science standards. Next Generation Science Standards. (2022, August 11). Retrieved August 30, 2022, from https://www.nextgenscience.org/
NGSS for California Public Schools, K-12. NGSS for California Public Schools, K-12 - Science (CA Dept of Education). (n.d.). Retrieved August 30, 2022, from https://www.cde.ca.gov/PD/ca/sc/ngssstandards.asp
Powdthavee, N. (2020). The causal effect of education on climate literacy and pro-environmental behaviours: Evidence from a nationwide natural experiment. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3596676
Ritchie, T., Heeschen, K., Winch, N., Yoo, J., Maruyama, A., & Chartove, N. (2019, May). The State of Global Climate and Environmental Education. earthday.org. Retrieved 2022, from https://www.earthday.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/World-Bank-Environmental-and-Climate-Literacy-Final-Report.pdf
Rousell, D., & Cutter-Mackenzie-Knowles, A. (2019). A systematic review of Climate Change Education: Giving children and young people a ‘voice’ and a ‘hand’ in redressing climate change. Children's Geographies, 18(2), 191–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2019.1614532
Taddicken, M., Reif, A., & Hoppe, I. (2018). What do people know about climate change ― and how confident are they? On measurements and analyses of science related knowledge. Journal of Science Communication, 17(3). https://doi.org/10.22323/2.17030201
Wang, Q., Niu, G., Gan, X., & Cai, Q. (2022). Green returns to education: Does education affect pro-environmental attitudes and behaviors in China? PLOS ONE, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263383
What is climate science literacy? NOAA Climate.gov. (n.d.). Retrieved August 30, 2022, from https://www.climate.gov/teaching/what-is-climate-science-literacy
Wise, S. B. (2010). Climate change in the classroom: Patterns, motivations, and barriers to instruction among Colorado Science Teachers. Journal of Geoscience Education, 58(5), 297–309. https://doi.org/10.5408/1.3559695
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2022 Marisa Bist; Laura Mayberry
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-sa/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright holder(s) granted JSR a perpetual, non-exclusive license to distriute & display this article.