Are Hate Crime Enhancements Warranted in American Law?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v11i4.3466Keywords:
Hate Crimes, Constitution, American Legal Theory, Legal Philosophy, Due Process, American Justice SystemAbstract
Hate crimes are crimes that have an unusual bias upon a certain group due to their specific identity. In the American legal system, it has been a long-time controversy surrounding whether a hate crime enhancement is warranted for those classified as such. This paper first seeks to examine the rationality of hate crime enhancements, using established hate crime legislature to analyze its purpose. Then it will apply such a framework to evaluate whether the legislature abides with legal philosophy and constitutional rights through the lens of moral culpability, past landmark cases, and implementation observances. The paper will explain that legal philosophy deems it impossible to assess motive, a key component of hate crimes. It will also challenge the current supreme court and landmark rulings upon hate crime legislature and points out an unconstitutional logical loophole. Flaws of implementation on demographics and due process are also pointed out as limitations. Through the three-prong analysis, although a justification for current hate crime enhancements is present due to the potential physical and mental damages, it is concluded that they are unconstitutional, unwarranted, and must be limited to ensure the justice of the American legal system.
Downloads
References or Bibliography
References
Andone, Dakin. “Buffalo Shooting Suspect Said He Committed Massacre 'for the Future of the White Race' in Note Apologizing to His Family, Affidavit Says.” CNN, Cable News Network, 16 June 2022, edition.cnn.com/2022/06/16/us/buffalo-shooting-suspect-federal-court/index.html.
Briana Alongi, The Negative Ramifications of Hate Crime Legislation: It’s Time to Reevaluate Whether Hate Crime Laws are Beneficial to Society, 37 Pace L. Rev. 326 (2017).
Christopher Heath Wellman, A Defense of Stiffer Penalties for Hate Crimes, 21 HYPATIA 62, 64 (2006).
Five Things About Deterrence, Nat’l Inst. Just, (June 5, 2016), https://nij.ojp.gov/topics/articles/five-things- about-deterrence.
FLA. STAT. § 775.085.
Freddoso, David. “Hate Crimes, Thought Crimes, Double Jeopardy.” National Review. National Review, June 3, 2010. https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/hate-crimes-thought-crimes-double-jeopardy- david-freddoso/.
Harel, Alon and Parchomovsky, Gideon, On Hate and Equality (1999). Faculty Scholarship at Penn Law. 1373.
Heidi M. Hurd & Michael S. Moore, Punishing Hatred and Prejudice, 56 STAN. L. REV. 1081 (2004).
Herbert Wechsler, A Thoughtful Code of Substantive Law, 45 J. CRIM. L. & CRIMINOLOGY &POLICE Sci. 524, 525 (1955).
IDAHO CODE ANN. §§ 18-7901, 7902.
James Morsch, The Problem of Motive in Hate Crimes: The Argument Against Presumptions of Racial Motivation, 82 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 659, 664–69 (1991).
Janine Young Kim, Hate Crime Law and the Limits of Inculpation, 84 Neb. L. Rev. (2005).
Jean Hampton, The Moral Education Theory of Punishment, in PUNISHMENT 112, 117 (A. John Simmons et al. eds., 1995).
Jeannine Bell, Policing Hatred: Law Enforcement, Civil Rights, and Hate Crime 4 (2002).
Matthew Shepard and James Byrd, Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act of 2009, 18 U.S.C. § 249.
Megan Sullaway, The Psychology of Hate Crime Law, Victims, and Offenders, in CRITICAL RACE
REALISM: INTERSECTIONS OF PSYCHOLOGY, RACE, AND LAW 238 (Gregory S. Parks et al. eds., 2008).
R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul, 505 U.S. 377 (1992).
Robert J. Sampson & John H. Laub, Life-Course Desisters? Trajectories of Crime Among Delinquent Boys Followed to Age 70, 41 Criminology 301, 330 (2003).
Schweppe, Jennifer and Walters, Mark Austin, Hate Crimes: Legislating to Enhance Punishment, Oxford Handbooks Online, Criminology and Criminal Justice (2015).
Shively, Michael. Study of Literature and Legislation on Hate Crime In America. U.S. Department of Justice, (2005).
State v. Wyant, 64 Ohio St. 3d 566 (Ohio 1992).
Steven Bennett Weisburd & Brian Levin, “On the Basis of Sex”: Recognizing Gender-Based Bias Crimes, 5 STAN. L. & POL’Y REV. 21, 23 (1994).
Texas v. Johnson, 491 U.S. 397 (1989).
Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-423.
Virginia v. Black, 538 U.S. 343 (2003).
Wisconsin v. Mitchell, 508 U.S. 476 (1993).
Wis. Stat. §§ 940.19(lm), 939.50(3)(e), and § 939.645(1)(b).1
Sources Consulted
Frederick M. Lawrence, The Punishment of Hate: Toward a Normative Theory of Bias-Motivated Crimes, 93 MICH. L. REV. 320 (1994).
Frederick M. Lawrence, Punishing Hate: Bias Crimes under American Law. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1999.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2022 Joshua Zhang
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright holder(s) granted JSR a perpetual, non-exclusive license to distriute & display this article.
