High School Students’ Psychological Distances to Climate Change in Rural Southern Maryland
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v11i4.3370Keywords:
climate change, psychological distance, high school students, perceptions, climate concern, global warmingAbstract
With the academic consensus thoroughly agreeing that climate change is anthropogenic, research is examining the public’s perceptions of climate change through the psychological distance framework to ultimately develop climate change prevention strategies. Researchers generally agree that psychological proximity predicts climate concern, and concern predicts action. To fill the gap in the research surrounding youth perceptions of climate change, this study investigates students’ psychological distance to climate change in a rural southern Maryland high school. Analysis of participants’ open-ended and closed-ended responses suggest that youth who have been exposed to firsthand climate change-associated events and impacts tend to have proximal perceptions of climate change and high climate concern. This research supports direct and interactive exposure to impacted ecosystems to proximize climate change, influence climate concern, and ultimately encourage action. Future research should investigate youths’ perceptions in developing countries and other climate sensitive locations, as well as using experimental approaches to further investigate the relationship between psychological distance, concern, and action in youth populations.
Downloads
References or Bibliography
AAAS. (2009, December 4). AAAS reaffirms statements on Climate change and integrity. American Association for the Advancement of Science. Retrieved March 19, 2022, from https://www.aaas.org/news/aaas-reaffirms-statements-climate-change-and-integrity
Bhattacherjee, A. (2012). Survey Research. In Social Science Research: Principles, methods, and practices (pp. 73–82). essay, Global Text Project. Retrieved January 23, 2022, from https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/oa_textbooks/3/.
Bouman, T., Steg, L., & Kiers, H. A. (2018). Measuring values in environmental research: A test of an environmental portrait value questionnaire. Frontiers in Psychology, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00564
Brügger, A. (2020). Understanding the psychological distance of climate change: The limitations of construal level theory and suggestions for alternative theoretical perspectives. Global Environmental Change, 60, 102023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.102023
Chesapeake Bay Foundation. (2022a). Climate change. Chesapeake Bay Foundation. Retrieved March 6, 2022, from https://www.cbf.org/issues/climate-change
Chesapeake Bay Foundation. (2022b). The economic importance of the Bay. Chesapeake Bay Foundation. Retrieved April 3, 2022, from https://www.cbf.org/issues/what-we-have-to-lose/economic-importance-of-the-bay/
Cook, J., Oreskes, N., Doran, P. T., Anderegg, W. R., Verheggen, B., Maibach, E. W., Carlton, J. S., Lewandowsky, S., Skuce, A. G., Green, S. A., Nuccitelli, D., Jacobs, P., Richardson, M., Winkler, B., Painting, R., & Rice, K. (2016). Consensus on consensus: A synthesis of consensus estimates on human-caused global warming. Environmental Research Letters, 11(4), 048002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/4/048002
Cook, J., Nuccitelli, D., Green, S. A., Richardson, M., Winkler, B., Painting, R., Way, R., Jacobs, P., & Skuce, A. (2013). Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature. Environmental Research Letters, 8(2), 024024. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/2/024024
Corner, A., Roberts, O., Chiari, S., Völler, S., Mayrhuber, E. S., Mandl, S., & Monson, K. (2015). How do young people engage with climate change? the role of knowledge, values, message framing, and trusted communicators. WIREs Climate Change, 6(5), 523–534. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.353
Elms Environmental Center. (2021, September 13). Field studies (K - 12). Elms Environmental Education Center. Retrieved April 3, 2022, from https://sites.google.com/smcps.org/elmsenvironmental/school-programs/field-studies-k-12
Feldman, H. R. (2021). Motivators of participation and non-participation in youth environmental protests. Frontiers in Political Science, 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2021.662687
Gifford, R. (2011). The dragons of inaction: Psychological barriers that limit climate change mitigation and adaptation. American Psychologist, 66(4), 290–302. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023566
Gubler, M., Brügger, A., & Eyer, M. (2019). Adolescents’ perceptions of the psychological distance to climate change, its relevance for building concern about it, and the potential for education. Climate Change Management, 129–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32898-6_8
Heede, R. (2013). Tracing anthropogenic carbon dioxide and methane emissions to fossil fuel and cement producers, 1854–2010. Climatic Change, 122(1-2), 229–241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0986-y
IPCC, 2021: Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Masson-Delmotte, V., P. Zhai, A. Pirani, S.L. Connors, C. Péan, S. Berger, N. Caud, Y. Chen, L. Goldfarb, M.I. Gomis, M. Huang, K. Leitzell, E. Lonnoy, J.B.R. Matthews, T.K. Maycock, T. Waterfield, O. Yelekçi, R. Yu, and B. Zhou (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press. In Press.
Kiger, M. E., & Varpio, L. (2020). Thematic analysis of qualitative data: AMEE Guide no. 131. Medical Teacher, 42(8), 846–854. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159x.2020.1755030
Lee, K., Gjersoe, N., O'Neill, S., & Barnett, J. (2020). Youth perceptions of climate change: A narrative synthesis. WIREs Climate Change, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.641
Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. (2008). The psychology of transcending the here and now. Science, 322(5905), 1201–1205. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1161958
Loy, L. S. & Spence, A. (2020). Reducing, and bridging, the psychological distance of climate change. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101388
Martin, C., & Czellar, S. (2016). The extended Inclusion of Nature in Self scale. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 47, 181-194. 10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.05.006
Monroe, M. C., Plate, R. R., Oxarart, A., Bowers, A., & Chaves, W. A. (2017). Identifying effective climate change education strategies: A systematic review of the research. Environmental Education Research, 25(6), 791–812. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2017.1360842.
Najjar, R. G., Pyke, C. R., Adams, M. B., Breitburg, D., Hershner, C., Kemp, M., Howarth, R., Mulholland, M. R., Paolisso, M., Secor, D., Sellner, K., Wardrop, D., & Wood, R. (2010). Potential climate-change impacts on the Chesapeake Bay. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 86(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2009.09.026
National Parks Service. (2018, December 14). Ecosystems. Chesapeake Bay. Retrieved April 3, 2022, from https://www.nps.gov/chba/planyourvisit/ecosystems.htm
Ojala, M., & Lakew, Y. (2017). Young People and Climate Change Communication. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Climate Science. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228620.013.408
Rosa, C. D., & Collado, S. (2019). Experiences in nature and environmental attitudes and behaviors: Setting the ground for future research. Frontiers in Psychology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00763
Shaftel, H. (2022, March 7). The causes of climate change. Global Climate Change. Retrieved March 19, 2022, from https://climate.nasa.gov/causes/
Singh, A. S., Zwickle, A., Bruskotter, J. T., & Wilson, R. (2017). The perceived psychological distance of climate change impacts and its influence on support for adaptation policy. Environmental Science & Policy, 73, 93–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.04.011
Spence, A., Poortinga, W., & Pidgeon, N. (2012). The psychological distance of climate change. Risk Analysis, 32(6), 957–972. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01695.x
United Nations. (1992, May 9). United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. United Nations Treaty Collection. Retrieved December 6, 2021, from https://treaties.un.org/pages/ViewDetailsIII.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=XXVII-7&chapter=27&Temp=mtdsg3&clang=_en.
United States Census Review. (2021). St. Mary's County, Maryland. United States Census Review. Retrieved November 16, 2021, from https://data.census.gov/cedsci/profile?g=0500000US24037.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2022 Adrianne Allred; Dr. Solomon
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright holder(s) granted JSR a perpetual, non-exclusive license to distriute & display this article.
