The Socioeconomic Impacts of Emergent Biotechnology on the Next Human Age
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v11i4.3141Keywords:
biotechnology, bioethics, pharmaceutical industry, socioeconomic divisionsAbstract
Modern biotechnology has progressed to unforeseeable heights, from genetic engineering to radical life extension. The rapid advent of this technology has enforced upon us a duty to contemplate the ethics surrounding it to inform our decisions. One pressing aspect of contemporary bioethics lies in medical developments that have become widely consumed resources. In modern society, big pharmaceutical companies dominate the healthcare industry, which makes them uniquely positioned to introduce new-age biotechnology as consumer resources. A "big pharma" future exemplified by the emergence of revolutionary new-age biotechnology presents severe ethical concerns. This paper describes potential scenarios where emergent biotechnology becomes a consumer resource as a result of aggressive marketing, indirect coercion, and monopoly of the "big pharma" companies. Chasing higher profitability and benefiting from their monopoly position, big pharmaceutical companies can price new biotechnologies at excessive levels, resulting in new biotechnology proliferating along socioeconomic lines. Such a development threatens to create an elite genetic class and destroy social mobility. In order to mitigate such consequences, this paper proposes a price cap mechanism to improve equal access to emerging biotechnology and promote innovations in breakthrough treatments.
Downloads
References or Bibliography
Badger, D. (2021, April 19). Pharmaceutical Innovation Is Winning the War on COVID. Biden Shouldn’t Disarm. The Heritage Foundation. Retrieved May 29, 2022, from https://www.heritage.org/health-care-reform/commentary/pharmaceutical-innovation-winning-the-war-covid-biden-shouldnt-disarm
Cefalu, W. T., Dawes, D. E., Gavlak, G., Goldman, D., Herman, W. H., van Nuys, K., Powers, A. C., Taylor, S. I., & Yatvin, A. L. (2018). Insulin Access and Affordability Working Group: Conclusions and Recommendations. Diabetes Care, 41(6), 1299–1311. https://doi.org/10.2337/dci18-0019
Encyclopedia Britannica. (n.d.). Green Revolution. Retrieved May 22, 2022, from https://www.britannica.com/event/green-revolution
Erdem, E., Prada, S. I., & Samuel, S. (2013). Medicare Payments: How Much Do Chronic Conditions Matter? Medicare & Medicaid Research Review, 3(2), E1–E15. https://doi.org/10.5600/mmrr.003.02.b02
Feldman, R., & Wang, C. (2017). May Your Drug Price Be Ever Green. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3061567
Fukuyama, F. (2003). Our Posthuman Future: Consequences of the Biotechnology Revolution (Reprint ed.). Picador.
History.com Editors. (2021, August 25). Bronze Age. HISTORY. https://www.history.com/topics/pre-history/bronze-age#section_2
Hua, X., Carvalho, N., Tew, M., Huang, E. S., Herman, W. H., & Clarke, P. (2016). Expenditures and Prices of Antihyperglycemic Medications in the United States: 2002–2013. JAMA, 315(13), 1400. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.0126
Ikegami, N., & Anderson, G. F. (2012). In Japan, All-Payer Rate Setting Under Tight Government Control Has Proved To Be An Effective Approach To Containing Costs. Health Affairs, 31(5), 1049–1056. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2011.1037
IQVIA Institute for Human Data Science. (2019, April). The Changing Landscape of Research and Development. https://www.iqvia.com/-/media/iqvia/pdfs/institute-reports/the-changing-landscape-of-research-and-development.pdf?&_=1653841020821
Kass, L. R. (2004). Life, Liberty and the Defense of Dignity: The Challenge for Bioethics. Joyous Publishing.
Nathan-Kazis, J. (2022, May 6). Big Pharma Has Enough Cash to Buy All of Biotech. Why M&A Isn’t Happening. Barron’s. Retrieved May 30, 2022, from https://www.barrons.com/articles/big-pharma-mergers-biotech-cash-51651844327
National Library of Medicine. (n.d.). The Discovery of the Double Helix, 1951–1953. Francis Crick - Profiles in Science. Retrieved May 22, 2022, from https://profiles.nlm.nih.gov/spotlight/sc/feature/doublehelix
Normile, D. (2018, November 26). Science. ScienceInsider. Retrieved May 22, 2022, from https://www.science.org/content/article/crispr-bombshell-chinese-researcher-claims-have-created-gene-edited-twins
OECD. (2018, June). Pharmaceutical Reimbursement and Pricing in Germany. https://www.oecd.org/health/health-systems/Pharmaceutical-Reimbursement-and-Pricing-in-Germany.pdf
Pharma Intelligence. (2020, March). A Decade of Biopharma M&A and Outlook for 2020. Informa. https://pharmaintelligence.informa.com/~/media/informa-shop-window/pharma/2020/files/whitepapers/ma-whitepaper.pdf
Rizvi, Z. (2020, September). Gilead First: How a Monopoly on Remdesivir Led to Rationing. Public Citizen. https://www.citizen.org/article/gilead-first/
Sprunt, B. (2022, March 31). House passes bill to cap insulin prices. NPR. Retrieved May 22, 2022, from https://www.npr.org/2022/03/31/1090085513/house-passes-bill-to-cap-insulin-prices?t=1653253669992
Van Zee A. (2009). The promotion and marketing of oxycontin: commercial triumph, public health tragedy. American journal of public health, 99(2), 221–227. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2007.131714
Wouters, O. J. (2020). Lobbying Expenditures and Campaign Contributions by the Pharmaceutical and Health Product Industry in the United States, 1999–2018. JAMA Internal Medicine, 180(5), 688. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.0146
Yu, N., Helms, Z., & Bach, P. (2017). R&D Costs For Pharmaceutical Companies Do Not Explain Elevated US Drug Prices. Forefront Group. https://doi.org/10.1377/forefront.20170307.059036
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2022 Albert Xie; Connie Hong
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright holder(s) granted JSR a perpetual, non-exclusive license to distriute & display this article.