The Impact of Behavioral Nudging in Economic Theory on High School Grading Policies and Student Achievement

Authors

  • Alex Parikh-Briggs Menlo-Atherton High School
  • Suraj Nair Oxford University
  • Prakriti Sharma Lumiere Education

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v11i2.2626

Keywords:

Behavioral economics, Neoclassical Economics, Behavioral Nudging, High School Grading, Education Economics, Student Motivation, Standard-Based Grading

Abstract

This research paper examines the implications of neoclassical economic theory and behavioral economic nudges on high school teachers' grading policies and the motivation and academic achievement of students. I further develop the literature in education economics to investigate various grading policies chosen by teachers and the impact on student motivation and educational outcomes. I highlight teacher preferences which include a traditional grading policy or five-point system, using the letters A-E/F. On the other hand, students prefer grading systems that evaluate what they are learning, allow for effort-based achievement, and consider classroom participation, as opposed to homework and exam scores alone. I examine the benefits and detriments of different grading policies within my high school, Menlo-Atherton High School including traditional grading, standards-based grading (SBG) and pass-fail grading.  First, I review the current literature and analyze the major differences between the approaches of neoclassical versus behavioral economics including nudges. Specifically, I examine factors that contribute to a student’s academic achievement and review the literature on grading. Second, I focus on student behavior and motivation that help to incentivize greater academic achievement. Third, I interview several teachers to characterize their grading policy and overall student motivation.  Last, I compare the student and teacher findings and the associated behavior and motivation. Overall, my findings and analysis appear to support directionally that a new educational policy focused on a standards-based grading (SBG) policy combined with various behavioral nudges impact student decisions, motivate high school students, and improve educational outcomes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Suraj Nair, Oxford University

Advisor

Ph.D. candidate at SOAS London

References or Bibliography

Allen, J. D. (2005). Grades as Valid Measures of Academic Achievement of Classroom Learning. The Clearing House, 78(5), 218–223. http://www.jstor.org/stable/30189912

Bryman, A. (2012). Social research methods (4th ed.). Oxford University Press.

Corr, P., & Plagnol, A. (2018). Behavioral economics. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315391229

Coutts, P. M. (2004). Meanings of Homework and Implications for Practice. Theory Into Practice, 43(3), 182–188. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3701519

Effects of standards-based report cards on student learning. (2011). In T. A. Craig (Author), Effects of Standards-Based Report Cards on Student Learning. (Reprinted from ProQuest)

Feldman, J. (2019). Beyond standards-based grading: Why equity must be part of grading reform. The Phi Delta Kappan, 100(8), 52–55. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26677395

Feldman, J. (2019). Beyond standards-based grading: Why equity must be part of grading reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 100(8), 52-55. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0031721719846890

Gordon, M. E., & Fay, C. H. (2010). The Effects of Grading and Teaching Practices on Students' Perceptions of Grading Fairness. College Teaching, 58(3), 93–98. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41305091

Guskey, T. R. (2019). GRADES VERSUS COMMENTS: Research on student feedback. The Phi Delta Kappan, 101(3), 42–47. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26837681

Hochbein, C., & Pollio, M. (2016). Making grades more meaningful. The Phi Delta Kappan, 98(3), 49–54. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24893578

Koch, A., Nafziger, J., & Nielsen, H. S. (2015). Behavioral economics of education. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 115, 3-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2014.09.005

Kraft, M. A., & Dougherty, S. M. (2013). The effect of teacher–family communication on student engagement: Evidence from a randomized field experiment. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 6(3), 199-222. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2012.743636

Lavecchia, A., Liu, H., & Oreopoulos, P. (2014, October). Behavioral economics of education: Progress and possibilities. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w20609

Main, J. B., & Ost, B. (2014). The Impact of Letter Grades on Student Effort, Course Selection, and Major Choice: A Regression-Discontinuity Analysis. The Journal of Economic Education, 45(1), 1–10. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43610491

Malkus, N., Christensen, C., & Schurz, J. (2020). School District Responses to the COVID-19 Pandemic: Round 6, Ending the Year of School Closures. American Enterprise Institute. http://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep25360

Miller, J. J. (2013). A Better Grading System: Standards-Based, Student-Centered Assessment. The English Journal, 103(1), 111–118. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24484069

Mullainathan, S., & Thaler, R. H. (2000). Behavioral Economics. SSRN.

Reeves, D. B. (2004). Making Standards Work.

Sallee, B., & Rigler, N. (2008). Doing Our Homework on Homework: How Does Homework Help? The English Journal, 98(2), 46–51. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40503382

Schoen, H. L., Cebulla, K. J., Finn, K. F., & Fi, C. (2003). Teacher Variables That Relate to Student Achievement When Using a Standards-Based Curriculum. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34(3), 228–259. https://doi.org/10.2307/30034779

Simon, H. A. (1959). Theories of Decision-Making in Economics and Behavioral Science. The American Economic Review, 49(3), 253–283. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1809901

Sunstein, C. (2014). Why Nudge?: The Politics of Libertarian Paternalism. New Haven: Yale University Press. https://doi.org/10.12987/9780300206920

Townsley, M., & Buckmiller, T. (2016, January). What does the research say about standards-based grading?

Whitehead, M., Howell, R., Jones, R., Lilley, R., & Pykett, J. (2014). Nudging all over the World: Assessing the Global Impact of the Behavioural Sciences on Public Policy. Economic & Social Research Council.

Young, S. (2017). Behavioural Economics. Rethinking Economics: An Introduction to Pluralism, 76-90.

Published

05-31-2022

How to Cite

Parikh-Briggs, A., Nair, S., & Sharma, P. (2022). The Impact of Behavioral Nudging in Economic Theory on High School Grading Policies and Student Achievement . Journal of Student Research, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v11i2.2626

Issue

Section

HS Research Projects