Examining the Connections between Personality and Group-Based Learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v11i2.2517Keywords:
group-based learning, personality styles, group workAbstract
The most common interpretation of personality is a tripartite model: introversion, extroversion, and ambiversion. Personality styles can have an impact not only on how people develop relationships and pursue interests, but also how students operate in the classroom. Given that schools and teachers frequently require students to collaborate in group-based learning activities, it is crucial to consider how personality styles affect this process. In this cross-sectional research study, 14 high school participants responded to a questionnaire about personality type and group learning experiences. The questionnaire was designed with the goal of gathering experiences from high school students about group work and group-based learning in the classroom and personality styles. The results of the questionnaire showed that there was no statistically significant difference between the three personality styles. The results were also analyzed for themes to compare commonalities and differences in responses across personality styles. There was a relatively small sample size in the current study of 14 participants out of the 60 who were sent the questionnaire meaning this study might not have been able to fully capture the most accurate answer to the question of whether introverts work well while working in groups. Nonetheless, this study paves the way for further research on the topic of group-based learning and personality styles.
Downloads
References or Bibliography
Cain, S. (2013). Quiet: The power of introverts in a world that can't stop talking. Broadway Books.
Eysenck, H. J. (1990). Biological dimensions of personality.
Flanagan, K. M., & Addy, H. (2019). Introverts are not disadvantaged in group-based active learning classrooms. Bioscene: Journal of College Biology Teaching, 45(1), 33-41.
Hammar Chiriac, E. (2014). Group work as an incentive for learning–students’ experiences of group work. Frontiers in psychology, 5, 558. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00558
Honey, P., & Mumford, A. (1989). Learning styles questionnaire. Organization Design and Development, Incorporated.
Huxham, M., & Land, R. (2000). Assigning students in group work projects. Can we do better than random?. Innovations in Education and Training International, 37(1), 17-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/135580000362043
Jung, C. (2016). Psychological types. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315512334
Matthews, G., Deary, I.J., & Whiteman, M.C. (2009). Personality traits (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press
Williamson, M. F., & Watson, R. L. (2007). Learning styles research: Understanding how teaching should be impacted by the way learners learn part III: Understanding how learners' personality styles impact learning. Christian Education Journal, 4(1), 62-77. https://doi.org/10.1177/073989130700400105
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2022 Jonathan Huang
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright holder(s) granted JSR a perpetual, non-exclusive license to distriute & display this article.