Warping Spacetime: When Theoretical Physics Meets Science Fiction
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v11i1.2234Keywords:
warp drives, general relativity, theoretical physics, science fiction, Alcubierre driveAbstract
Warp drives, though first envisioned in science fiction, have become a topic of scientific interest within theoretical physics. Miguel Alcubierre was the first one to propose a warp drive spacetime in 1994. His geometry is, however, considered unphysical: it violates all energy conditions and requires large amounts of exotic matter. Several modifications to his metric have been proposed which reduce these energy requirements, but it is still unlikely that warp drives will ever be technologically useful. Even so, they make for very interesting thought experiments, forcing physicists to face the limits of their current theories. Here we will discuss the Alcubierre drive, its energy condition violations, and its energy requirements as obtained from the quantum inequalities. The general definition of superluminal travel is briefly discussed. We also study the horizon problem and the possibility of closed timelike curves within this spacetime. Some recent progress in warp drive research is presented, followed by a conclusion which expands on the physical plausibility and research interest in warp drives.
Downloads
References or Bibliography
Alcubierre, M. (1994). The warp drive: hyper-fast travel within general relativity. Classical and Quantum Gravity 11.5. https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/11/5/001
Bobrick, A., & Martire, G. (2021). Introducing Physical Warp Drives. Classical and Quantum Gravity, p. 105009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-6382/abdf6e
Carroll, S.M. (2004). Spacetime and Geometry An Introduction to General Relativity.
Everett, A.E., & Roman, T.A. (1997). Superluminal subway: The Krasnikov tube. Physical Review D 56.4, pp. 2100-2108. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.56.2100
Fell, S.D.B, & Heisenberg, L. (2021). Positive Energy Warp Drives from Hidden Geometric Structures. Classical and Quantum Gravity 38.15, p. 155020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-6382/ac0e47
Ford, L.H. (1978). Quantum Coherence Effects and the Second Law of Thermodynamics. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences 364.1717, pp. 227-236. http://www.jstor.org/stable/79760
Ford, L.H., & Roman, T.A. (1978). Averaged Energy Conditions and Quantum Inequalities. Physical Review D 51.8, pp. 4277-4286. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.51.4277
Hartle, J.B. (2003). Gravity: An Introduction to Einstein’s General Relativity.
Hiscock, W. (2002). From Wormholes to the Warp Drive: Using theoretical physics to place ultimate bounds on technology. Phi Kappa Phi Forum, Volume 82, Number 4.
Kar, S., Dadhich, N., & Visser, M. (2004). Quantifying energy condition violations in traversable wormholes. Pramana 63.4, pp. 859-864. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02705207
Krasnikov, S.V. (1998). Hyperfast travel in general relativity. Physical Review D 57.8, pp. 4760-4766. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.57.4760
Lee, J.S., & Cleaver, G.B. (2016). Effects of external radiation on an Alcubierre warp bubble. Physics Essays 29.2, pp. 201-206. http://dx.doi.org/10.4006/0836-1398-29.2.201
Lentz, E.W. (2021). Breaking the Warp Barrier: Hyper-Fast Solitons in Einstein-Maxwell-Plasma Theory. Classical and Quantum Gravity 38 075015. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6382/abe692
Lobo, F.S.N. (2017). Wormholes, Warp Drives and Energy Conditions. Fundamental Theories of Physics. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55182-1
Lobo, F.S.N., & Visser, M. (2004). Fundamental limitations on “warp drive” spacetimes. Classical and Quantum gravity 21.24, pp. 5971-5892. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/21/24/011
McMonigal, B., Lewis, G.F., & O’Byrne, P. (2012). Alcubierre warp drive: On the matter of matter. Physical Review D 85.6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.85.064024
Natário, J. (2002). Warp drive with zero expansion. Classical and Quantum Gravity 19.6, pp. 1157-1165. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/19/6/308
Olum, K.D. (1998). Superluminal Travel Requires Negative Energies. Physical Review Letters 81.17, pp. 3567-3570. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/14/7/011
Price, R.H. (1982). General relativity primer. American Journal of Physics 50.4, pp. 300-329. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.12853
Santiago, J., Schuster, S., & Visser, M. (2021a). Generic warp drives violate the null energy condition. arXiv: 2105.03079 [gr-qc].
Santiago, J., Schuster, S., & Visser, M. (2021b). Tractor Beams, Pressor Beams, and Stressor Beams in General Relativity. Universe, 7(8), 271. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/universe7080271
Van Den Broeck, C. (1999). A ‘warp drive’ with more reasonable total energy requirements. Classical and Quantum Gravity 16.12, pp. 3973-3979. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/16/12/314
Visser, M., Bassett, B.A., & Liberati, S. (2000). Superluminal censorship. Nuclear Physics B – Proceedings Supplements 88.1-3, pp. 267-270. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0920-5632(00)00782-9
Visser, M., Bassett, B., & Liberati, S. (1999). Perturbative superluminal censorship and the null energy condition. Eighth Canadian conference on general relativity and relativistic astrophysics. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1301601
White, H. (2013). Warp Field Mechanics 101. Journal of the British Interplanetary Society 66, pp. 242-247.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2023 Luanna Quinalha; Sarah Rice
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright holder(s) granted JSR a perpetual, non-exclusive license to distriute & display this article.