A Comparison of Waterproof Motor Housings for Student Robotics Teams

Authors

  • Charlie Diaz Jesuit High School
  • Colin O'Connor Mentor, Jesuit High School

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v10i4.2193

Keywords:

Underwater Robotics, Waterproof, Motor, Motor Housing, ROV, MATE ROV Competition

Abstract

Professionals and students alike create high-performance Remotely Operated Vehicles (ROV)s to complete a multitude of tasks underwater. The student ROV competition created by Marine Advanced Technology Education (MATE) simulates the tasks faced by the modern professional underwater robotics industry. Students often design their ROVs with techniques used by the professional underwater robotics industry. Unlike professionals, students do not have many resources comparing manufacturable ROV components that fit within their design restrictions. Without information about components that they choose to use on their ROVs, students might miss an opportunity to implement a better alternative technology. Such is the case with older Shaft Sealed Housings (SSH) and less common Magnetically Coupled Housings (MCH). In this paper, essential aspects of both alternative designs for waterproof motor housings are tested to determine overall performance. The waterproofness of each housing is tested experimentally over long periods of time in an environment simulating the most extreme depths experienced at the MATE ROV Competition. Maximum static torque is measured on a torque sensor. Cost and manufacturability of each housing are recorded in tables. Ultimately, student robotics teams are left to determine which motor housing best fits their design requirements, based on the data discovered and presented in this paper.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Colin O'Connor, Mentor, Jesuit High School

Assistant Principal for Academics

References or Bibliography

Bowen, A. D., Yoerger, D. R., Taylor, C., McCabe, R., Howland, J., Gomez-Ibanez, D., ... & Jakuba, M. V. (2008, September). The Nereus hybrid underwater robotic vehicle for global ocean science operations to 11,000 m depth. In OCEANS 2008 (pp. 1-10). IEEE.

Capocci, R., Dooly, G., Omerdić, E., Coleman, J., Newe, T., & Toal, D. (2017). Inspection-class remotely operated vehicles—A review. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 5(1), 13.

Cooney, L. A. (2006). Development of a low-cost underwater manipulator (Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology).

Christ, R. D., & Wernli Sr, R. L. (2013). The ROV manual: a user guide for remotely operated vehicles. Butterworth-Heinemann.

Macreadie, P. I., McLean, D. L., Thomson, P. G., Partridge, J. C., Jones, D. O., Gates, A. R., ... & Fowler, A. M. (2018). Eyes in the sea: unlocking the mysteries of the ocean using industrial, remotely operated vehicles (ROVs). Science of the Total Environment, 634, 1077-1091.

Mai, C., Pedersen, S., Hansen, L., Jepsen, K. L., & Yang, Z. (2016, December). Subsea infrastructure inspection: A review study. In 2016 IEEE International Conference on Underwater System Technology: Theory and Applications (USYS) (pp. 71-76). IEEE.

Roberts, M. J. (2007). Design of small, low-cost, underwater fin manipulator (Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology).

Robison, B. H., Reisenbichler, K. R., & Sherlock, R. E. (2017). The coevolution of midwater research and ROV technology at MBARI. Oceanography, 30(4), 26-37.

Rubin, S. (2013, September). Mini-ROVs, going where no ROV has gone before. In 2013 OCEANS-San Diego (pp. 1-4). IEEE.

Salgado-Jimenez, T., Gonzalez-Lopez, J. L., Martinez-Soto, L. F., Olguin-Lopez, E., Resendiz-Gonzalez, P. A., & Bandala-Sanchez, M. (2010, May). Deep water ROV design for the Mexican oil industry. In OCEANS'10 IEEE SYDNEY (pp. 1-6). IEEE.

Sivčev, S., Coleman, J., Omerdić, E., Dooly, G., & Toal, D. (2018). Underwater manipulators: A review. Ocean Engineering, 163, 431-450.

Technology to extend your reach. (n.d.). Retrieved May 21, 2021, from http://krafttelerobotics.com/products/predator.htm

Whitcomb, L. L. (2000, April). Underwater robotics: Out of the research laboratory and into the field. In Proceedings 2000 ICRA. Millennium Conference. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Symposia Proceedings (Cat. No. 00CH37065) (Vol. 1, pp. 709-716). IEEE.

Wilhelm, L. R. (1976). Numerical calculation of psychrometric properties in SI units. Transactions of the ASAE, 19(2), 318-0321.

Zande, J., & Brown, C. (2008). ROV Competition Helps Students Develop Technical Skills and Build Marine Technical Workforce [Education]. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 15(1), 18-20.

Explorer Manual. (2021, May 10). Retrieved May 13, 2021, from https://files.materovcompetition.org/2021/2021_EXPLORER_Manual_10May2021.pdf

Published

12-22-2021

How to Cite

Diaz, C., & O’Connor, C. (2021). A Comparison of Waterproof Motor Housings for Student Robotics Teams. Journal of Student Research, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v10i4.2193

Issue

Section

AP Capstone™ Research