Why do Low-Income, High-Achieving Students not Apply to Top Universities?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v10i3.2004Keywords:
high school, higher education, college, college admissions, behavioral economics, availability heuristics, simulation heuristicAbstract
In this study, the behavior of low-income, high-achieving students when applying to prestigious universities is analyzed. It was postulated that this behavior is due to a lack of information provided to these students and the effect of several behavioral heuristics that influence these students’ application decisions — namely, availability, simulation, and the status quo bias. This paper focuses on the behavior of low-income, high-achieving students who do not apply to prestigious students and therefore behave in a manner typical to their income level rather than their ability. These students, who are less likely to attend magnet schools or live in major metropolitan areas, are often left out of initiatives and college resources available to high-income students. To address this disparity, two solutions are proposed to encourage income-typical students to apply to prestigious universities: the continuation of test-optional policies and virtual college tours.
Downloads
References or Bibliography
References
Black, Sandra E., Jeffrey T. Denning, and Jesse Rothstein. (2020). Winners and Losers? The Effect of Gaining and Losing Access to Selective Colleges on Education and Labor Market Outcomes. (EdWorkingPaper: 20-211).
Retrieved from Annenberg Institute at Brown University: https://doi.org/10.26300/qfxb-4433
Bleemer, Zachary. Top Percent Policies and the Return to Postsecondary Selectivity. Sept. 2020, zacharybleemer.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/ELC_Paper.pdf.
Borden, Taylor. “How Ivy League Financial Aid Packages Stack up, Even amid the Coronavirus Pandemic.” Business Insider, Business Insider, 4 Sept. 2020, www.businessinsider.com/how-ivy-league-financial-aid-packages-stack-up-coronavirus-tuition-2020-7.
Bowen, William, Martin Kurzweil, and Eugene Tobin. Equity and Excellence in American Higher Education. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 2005.
Bureau, US Census. “2008 Comparison Guidance.” The United States Census Bureau, 9 Sept. 2020, www.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/guidance/comparing-acs-data/2008.html.
Choy, Susan P. “Students Whose Parents Did Not Go to College: Postsecondary Access, Persistence, and Attainment.” PsycEXTRA Dataset, 2001, doi:10.1037/e492182006-021.
Dobelli, Rolf, et al. The Art of Thinking Clearly. PTS Publishing House, 2015.
Engberg, Mark E., and Gregory C. Wolniak. “Examining the Effects of High School Contexts on Postsecondary Enrollment.” Research in Higher Education, vol. 51, no. 2, 2010, pp. 132–153. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/40542368. Accessed 15 May 2021.
Freeberg, N. 1988. "Accuracy of Student Reported Information." College Board Report Number 88-5. http://professionals.collegeboard.com/profdownload/pdf/RR%2088-5.PDF
Hiss, William. “Defining Promise: Twenty-Five Years of Optional Testing at Bates College: 1984-2009.” 3 June 2011.
Hoxby, Caroline, and Christopher Avery. “The Missing ‘One-Offs’: The Hidden Supply of High-Achieving, Low Income Students.” 2012, doi:10.3386/w18586.
“Princeton Announces Plan for Fall 2020, Guidelines for Undergraduates Returning to Campus.” Princeton University, The Trustees of Princeton University, 6 July 2020, www.princeton.edu/news/2020/07/06/princeton-announces-plan-fall-2020-guidelines-undergraduates-returning-campus.
Martinez, Berenice, et al. Another 4 Years of High School: The Stuyvesant and Horace Mann to UChicago Pipeline. 6 Dec. 2020, cpb-us-w2.wpmucdn.com/voices.uchicago.edu/dist/8/2937/files/2020/11/MartinezReyesSong-Final-Paper.docx.
Meer, Jonathan, and Harvey Rosen. “Does Generosity Beget Generosity? Alumni Giving and Undergraduate Financial Aid.” 2012, doi:10.3386/w17861.
Pallais, Amanda, and Sarah Turner. “Opportunities for Low-Income Students at Top Colleges and Universities: Policy Initiatives and the Distribution of Students.” National Tax Journal, vol. 59, no. 2, 2006, pp. 357–386., doi:10.17310/ntj.2006.2.08.
Pros, Noodle. “When Colleges Go Test-Optional, Who Benefits?” Forbes, Forbes Magazine, 30 July 2015, www.forbes.com/sites/noodleeducation/2015/07/30/when-colleges-go-test-optional-who-benefits/?sh=69e05d847807.
“Status Quo Bias - Biases & Heuristics.” The Decision Lab, 22 Jan. 2021, thedecisionlab.com/biases/status-quo-bias/.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2021 Tanisha Srivatsa; Henry Weeks
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright holder(s) granted JSR a perpetual, non-exclusive license to distriute & display this article.
