Disparities in Research Studies and Their Impact on Marginalized Communities in Healthcare
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v10i2.1557Keywords:
Pre-Clinical Studies, Medical Treatment, Diversity, Marginalized Communites, Healthcare, Translational Medical SciencesAbstract
The United States healthcare system has been disproportionally affecting marginalized communities’ healthcare due to the lack of diversity in research studies. These effects can be seen in the African American community, the population of women, and the LGBTQ+ community. Throughout history actions taken by healthcare officials, specifically researchers, have fostered a negative association within communities about studies. Which has resulted in a lack of volunteers and participation within marginalized communities and consequently heavily decreased the diversity needed to accurately represent populations in studies.
This has created a rift in the accurateness of medical treatment that members of these communities face. Without access to recent information that details specific reactions, officials are often not able to treat patients in marginalized groups with accurate data. This creates problems with patients receiving care that is not geared towards them and doctors not taking into account biological differences in patients. The necessity of diversity in studies is seen through the treatment of marginalized communities today when patients have to face medical officials who are misinformed about how to treat them.
There is a distinct correlation between unsuccessful treatment and the lack of representation seen in research studies. Misinformation about marginalized communities is harmful to patients when they are trying to be treated and fosters negative feelings within these groups about healthcare officials. To stop perpetuating these ideas, medical officials need to become more active in gaining back marginalized communities’ trust and advocating for representation in research studies as a necessity for quality healthcare.
Downloads
References or Bibliography
Agoglia, A. (2019, October 24). Missing Data: How the Exclusion of Female Subjects from Medical Research Hurts Science. The Pipettepen. http://www.thepipettepen.com/missing-data-how-the-exclusion-of-female-subjects-from-medical-research-hurts-science.
Armstrong, K., Ravenell, K. L., McMurphy, S., & Putt, M. (2007). Racial/ethnic differences in physician distrust in the United States. American journal of public health, 97(7), 1283–1289. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2005.080762
Aronson, J., Burgess, D., Phelan, S. M., & Juarez, L. (2013). Unhealthy interactions: the role of stereotype threat in health disparities. American journal of public health, 103(1), 50–56. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2012.300828
Brown, B. A., Long, H. L., Weitz, T. A., & Milliken, N. (2000). Challenges of recruitment: focus groups with research study recruiters. Women & health, 31(2-3), 153–166. https://doi.org/10.1300/j013v31n02_08
Egleston, B. L., Dunbrack, R. L., Jr, & Hall, M. J. (2010). Clinical trials that explicitly exclude gay and lesbian patients. The New England journal of medicine, 362(11), 1054–1055. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc0912600
Emanuel, E. J., & Lavizzo-Mourey, R. (2020, September 24). 5 Ways the Health-Care System Can Stop Amplifying Racism. The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2020/09/how-health-care-can-stop-amplifying-racism/616454/.
Gay and Lesbian Medical Association and LGBT health experts. (2001). Healthy People 2010 Companion Document for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender (LGBT) Health. Gay and Lesbian Medical Association.
George, S., Duran, N., & Norris, K. (2014). A systematic review of barriers and facilitators to minority research participation among African Americans, Latinos, Asian Americans, and Pacific Islanders. American journal of public health, 104(2), e16–e31. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2013.301706
Greenwood, B. N., Carnahan, S., & Huang, L. (2018, August 21). Patient–physician gender concordance and increased mortality among female heart attack patients. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115 (34) 8569-8574. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1800097115.
Hafeez, H., Zeshan, M., Tahir, M. A., Jahan, N., & Naveed, S. (2017). Health Care Disparities Among Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Youth: A Literature Review. Cureus, 9(4), e1184. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.1184
Hilts, P. J. (1993, March 25). F.D.A. Ends Ban on Women in Drug Testing. https://www.nytimes.com/1993/03/25/us/fda-ends-ban-on-women-in-drug-testing.html.
Holdcroft, A. (2007). Gender bias in research: how does it affect evidence based medicine?. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 100(1), 2–3. https://doi.org/10.1177/014107680710000102
Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Health Issues and Research Gaps and Opportunities. (2011). In Health of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender People: Building a Foundation for Better Understanding. National Academies Press.
Mastroianni, A. C., Faden, R. R., & Federman, D. (1999). Women and Health Research, Volume 2: Ethical and Legal Issues of Including Women in Clinical Studies: Workshop and Commissioned Papers. National Academies Press.
Mirza , S. A., & Rooney, C. (2019, August 13). Discrimination Prevents LGBTQ People From Accessing Health Care. Center for American Progress. https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/lgbtq-rights/news/2018/01/18/445130/discrimination-prevents-lgbtq-people-accessing-health-care/.
Nathaniel Frank, N., & Baker, K. (2019, December 19). Perspective | Anti-LGBT discrimination has a huge human toll. Research proves it. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2019/12/19/anti-lgbt-discrimination-has-huge-human-toll-research-proves-it/.
Nix, E. (2017, May 16). Tuskegee Experiment: The Infamous Syphilis Study. History.com. https://www.history.com/news/the-infamous-40-year-tuskegee-study.
Scharff, D. P., Mathews, K. J., Jackson, P., Hoffsuemmer, J., Martin, E., & Edwards, D. (2010). More than Tuskegee: understanding mistrust about research participation. Journal of health care for the poor and underserved, 21(3), 879–897. https://doi.org/10.1353/hpu.0.0323
Schmotzer, G. L. Barriers and facilitators to participation of minorities in clinical trials. Ethnicity & Disease. https://www.ethndis.org/edonline/index.php/ethndis/article/view/510/562.
Somnath Pal, B. S. (P. (2015, October 16). Inclusion of Women in Clinical Trials of New Drugs and Devices. U.S. Pharmacist – The Leading Journal in Pharmacy. https://www.uspharmacist.com/article/inclusion-of-women-in-clinical-trials-of-new-drugs-and-devices.
Taylor, E., Guy-Walls, P., Wilkerson, P. et al. The Historical Perspectives of Stereotypes on African-American Males. J. Hum. Rights Soc. Work 4, 213–225 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41134-019-00096-y
Upham, Becky. (2020, February 18). Research Highlights Lack of Women Included in Cardiovascular Studies. Everyday Health. https://www.everydayhealth.com/heart-health/research-highlights-lack-of-women-included-in-cardiovascular-studies/
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2021 Keelynn Grasse; Wes Collman
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright holder(s) granted JSR a perpetual, non-exclusive license to distriute & display this article.
