The Use of Educational Exchange and International Education to Improve U.S.-Sino Relationship

Authors

  • Eva Liu Pinewood School
  • Ethan Hutt University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v10i2.1509

Keywords:

Educational Exchange, Global Education, U.S.-Sino Relations

Abstract

     As political scientist Graham Allison argues in his book, Destined for War, the United States and China “are currently on a collision course for war” (Allison, 2017, p. vii). Drawing on government reports and academic global education studies, this paper evaluates whether educational exchange and global education are plausible ways to de-escalate political tensions between the United States and China. This review indicates that studying abroad and educational exchange may de-escalate political tensions on a long-term horizon because of improved cultural understanding, foreign language acquisition, and students’ potential of making an impact after gaining new perspectives. After comparing case studies of educational exchange programs, I concluded that a balanced, government-funded, long-term exchange program between high school students will be the most effective in de-escalating political tensions between the U.S. and China. High schoolers are the best candidates because they are more likely to accept new perspectives and take less time to acquire a foreign language. Cultural understanding and respect facilitate diplomatic relations, and high schoolers in exchange programs will provide that cultural understanding in the future. Many people may think that political, economic, and military compromises are the only ways to de-escalate political tensions, specifically between the U.S. and China. However, this paper proves that the impact of educational exchange should not be underestimated, and this proposed plan of using educational exchange programs to strengthen U.S.-Sino relations is an actionable step towards solutions both countries can take up now with few significant barriers to entry. 

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Ethan Hutt, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

I am an Assistant Professor in the School of Education at the University of North Carolina – Chapel Hill. My research focuses on the relationship between schools, the law, and education policy. In particular, I’m interested in both the historical development, modern use, and on-going effects of the metrics we use to describe and evaluate our schools. 

References or Bibliography

Allison, G. T. (2017). Destined for war: Can America and China escape Thucydides’ Trap? (pp. vii, 200, 214-240). Mariners Press.

Brown, J. (2009). Study abroad program evaluation: What can be learned from student satisfaction surveys? (pp. 67). [Master’s thesis, Clemson University].

https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_theses/747

Bu, L. (1999). Educational exchange and cultural diplomacy in the Cold War. Journal of American Studies, 33(3), 414. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021875899006167

Coombs, P. H. (1964). The fourth dimension of foreign policy: Educational and cultural affairs (pp. 17). New York: Harper and Row.

Dwyer, M. (2004). More is better: The impact of study abroad program duration. Frontiers: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Study Abroad, 10, 151-163.

General Dynamics Information Technology. (2018). Hubert H. Humphrey Fellowship Program: Evaluation report.

https://eca.state.gov/files/bureau/humphrey_report_october_2018_final_v2_508_compliant.pdf

Hayhoe, R. (1984). A comparative analysis of Chinese-Western academic exchange. Comparative Education, 20(1), 40. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3098651

Li, H. (2008). U.S.- China educational exchange: State, society, and intercultural relations, 1905-1950 (pp. 176-201). New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt5hj1g5

Ma, J. T. (2003). From studying in America to staying in America. Chinese Studies in History, 56.

Orleans, L. A. (1988). Chinese students in America: Policies, issues, and numbers (pp. 57). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/743

Peck, K. (2014). The impact of academic exchange between China and the U.S., 1979-2010. Psi Sigma Siren, 8(1), 39-40.

https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/psi_sigma_siren/vol8/iss1/4

SRI International Center for Science, Technology and Economic Development. (2005). Outcome assessment of the visiting Fulbright Scholar Program (pp. 5, 7, 37).

https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED495810.pdf

Starkey, H. (1999). Foreign language teaching to adults: implicit and explicit political education (pp. 155). Oxford Review of Education.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/030549899104189

Streitwieser, B. T., Le, E., & Rust, V. (2012). Research on study abroad, mobility, and student exchange in comparative education scholarship. Research in Comparative

and International Education, 7(1), 5. http://dx.doi.org/10.2304/rcie.2012.7.1.5

Talburt, S., & Stewart, M. (1999). What’s the subject of study abroad?: Race, gender, and “living culture.” The Modern Language Journal, 163-175.

https://www.jstor.org/stable/330333

Wheeler, N. (2010). Educational exchange in Post-Mao U.S.-China relations: The Hopkins-Nanjing Center. The Journal of American-East Asian Relations, 17(1), 82-85.

http://www.jstor.org/stable/23613332

Published

07-01-2021

How to Cite

Liu, E., & Hutt, E. (2021). The Use of Educational Exchange and International Education to Improve U.S.-Sino Relationship . Journal of Student Research, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v10i2.1509

Issue

Section

HS Review Articles