Differences Among Visual, Auditory, and Kinesthetic Memorization Procedures when Children in Upper Elementary Schools are Memorizing a Text
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v10i1.1372Keywords:
memory, memorization techniques, elementary school, visual memory, kinesthetic memory, auditory memory, short-term memory, psychology, educationAbstract
In education, a variety of methods for learning or memorizing content are often used, from reading a passage to listening to a lecture. This plethora of available strategies cause those involved in the educational field to wonder if there is a type of device that helps students best retain information. The study described in this paper determined whether children in the 4th and 5th grade memorize a visual text most effectively when given either a visual, auditory, or kinesthetic strategy. A total of 56 respondents were selected from a local elementary school and divided into three equal groups to memorize as much of a 151-word poem as possible. After students were given 15 minutes to utilize their given device, an assessment was given, during which they had to fill in 15 missing words from the poem they had been assigned. Based on scores from the assessment, this study was able to show that the visual device yielded a higher mean score of 8.5 than either the auditory score of 6.7 and a kinesthetic score of 6.5. A series of t-tests were conducted to conclude that the visual mean produced a p-value of 0.08 against audio and 0.09 against kinesthetic, which is significant at a level of 0.10. This evidence suggests that when young children are assigned the task of memorizing a short passage, visual devices may be the most optimal choice.
Downloads
References or Bibliography
Chudler, E.H. (2019). Brain plasticity: What is it? Learning and memory.
https://faculty.washington.edu/chudler/plast.html
Delogu, F., & Lilla, C. C. (2017). Do you remember where sounds, pictures and words came
from? The role of the stimulus format in object location memory. Memory, 25(10),1340–1346.https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2017.1300668
Dzulkifli, M. A., & Solihu, A. K. H. (2018). Methods of Qur’ānic Memorisation (Ḥifẓ):
Implications for Learning Performance. Intellectual Discourse, 26(2), 931–947. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=133745932&site=ehost-live
Hargis, M. B., McGillivray, S., & Castel, A. D. (2018). Memory for Textbook Covers: When and
Why We Remember a Book by Its Cover. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 32(1), 39–46. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3375
Kinesthesia. (n.d.). In Merriam-Webster.com Dictionary. Retrieved from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/kinesthesia
Magimairaj, B. M., & Montgomery, J. W. (2013). Examining the Relative Contribution of Memory Updating, Attention Focus Switching, and Sustained Attention to Children’s Verbal Working Memory Span. Child Development Research, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/763808
Nesbitt, K. (2019). My Dog Likes to Dig. Retrieved from https://www.poetry4kids.com/poems/my-dog-likes-to-dig/
Nicolaou, E., Quach, J., Lum, J., Roberts, G., Spencer-Smith, M., Gathercole, S., … Wake, M. (2017). Changes in verbal and visuospatial working memory from Grade 1 to Grade 3 of primary school: Population longitudinal study. Child: Care, Health and Development, 44(3), 392–400. doi: 10.1111/cch.12543
Piccardi, L., Leonzi, M., D’Amico, S., Marano, A., & Guariglia, C. (2014). Development of navigational working memory: Evidence from 6- to 10-year-old children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 32(2), 205–217. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjdp.12036
Principe, G. F., Ornstein, P. A., Baker-Ward, L., & Gordon, B. N. (2000). The effects of intervening experiences on children’s memory for a physical examination. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14(1), 59–80. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(200001)14:1<59::AID-ACP637>3.0.CO;2-4
Reese, H. W. (1975). Verbal Effects in Children’s Visual Recognition Memory. Child Development, 46(2), 400–407. https://doi.org/10.2307/1128134
Sarma, G. P. (2015). Reconsidering Written Language. Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems, 13(3), 397–404. https://doi.org/10.7906/indecs.13.3.5
Social Science Statistics. (n.d.). Retrieved March 23, 2020, from http://www.socscistatistics.com/Default.aspx
Vatri, A. (2015). Ancient Greek Writing for Memory. Mnemosyne, 68(5), 750–773.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2021 Julie Beardslee
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright holder(s) granted JSR a perpetual, non-exclusive license to distriute & display this article.