Female Discrimination in the Workplace: Skilled Communicators But Undermined Leaders
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v10i1.1338Keywords:
women discrimination, female discrimination, workplace discrimination of women, female execution positions, gender communication, communication differences by gender, workplace gender communication, gender perception of female leadersAbstract
This literature review examines several studies related to differences in gender communication, gender perception, and the impact of workplace discrimination. Experimental studies on gender have revealed that women’s communication style is seen as genteel and empathetic while men’s communication styles are viewed as noisy and aggressive. And yet, people view leadership qualities as inherently more masculine than feminine. These differences are also reflected in leadership styles between men and women. The question remains if women display capable communication skills and leadership, why do discriminatory practices pervade in the workplace? Through a qualitative analysis of each paper, we draw the relationship between gender perceptions and workplace discrimination, including the lack of women in executive positions. A comparison between review articles helped to illustrate the differences in approach and similarity in results of pair of studies. Social theories presented in articles help to explain social phenomenons that undermine women. Concepts such as counter-stereotypical characteristics of women are discussed and the need for institutional policy enforcements is emphasized.
Downloads
References or Bibliography
Balkwell, J. W., & Berger, J. (1996). Gender, Status, and Behavior in Task Situations. Social Psychology Quarterly, 59(3), 273. https://doi.org/10.2307/2787023
Briton, N. J., & Hall, J. A. (1995). Beliefs about female and male nonverbal communication. Sex Roles, 32(1–2), 79–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01544758
Crenshaw, C. (1995). The “protection” of “woman”: A history of legal attitudes toward women’s workplace freedom. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 81(1), 63–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335639509384097
Hollis, L. (2017). Evasive Actions: The gendered cycle of stress and coping for those enduring workplace bullying in American higher education. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 4(7), 1. https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.47.2993
Leskinen, E. A., Rabelo, V. C., & Cortina, L. M. (2015). Gender stereotyping and harassment: A “catch-22” for women in the workplace. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 21(2), 192–204. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000040
Scott, K. A., & Brown, D. J. (2006). Female first, leader second? Gender bias in the encoding of leadership behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 101(2), 230–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.06.002
Seo, G., Huang, W., & Han, S.-H. C. (2017). Conceptual Review of Underrepresentation of Women in Senior Leadership Positions From a Perspective of Gendered Social Status in the Workplace. Human Resource Development Review, 16(1), 35–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484317690063
Sojo, V. E., Wood, R. E., & Genat, A. E. (2015). Harmful Workplace Experiences and Women’s Occupational Well-Being. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 40(1), 10–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684315599346
Stamarski, C. S., & Son Hing, L. S. (2015). Gender inequalities in the workplace: the effects of organizational structures, processes, practices, and decision makers’ sexism. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01400
Vasyura, S. A. (2008). Psychology of Male and Female Communicative Activity. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 11(1), 289–300. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1138741600004327
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2021 Allison Yue; Christine King
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright holder(s) granted JSR a perpetual, non-exclusive license to distriute & display this article.