The Influence of the FFA on the Cognitive Dissonance of the Meat Paradox
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v9i2.1071Keywords:
FFA, Meat Paradox, Cognitive DissonanceAbstract
The FFA, an American agricultural educational organization, was studied to determine its influence on the meat paradox, an ambivalent response towards eating meat while being troubled about its moral consequences. The study was completed using survey research, which involved asking FFA and non-FFA members about their feelings towards eating different types of meat, such as cows and rabbits. Participants were asked whether they would eat a particular animal and then their reasoning when choosing not to. The results were collected and compared between the FFA and non-FFA members’ responses. Overall, FFA members were more likely to eat abnormal animals. However, whenever participants decided that they were unwilling to eat an animal, FFA members reasoned that they wouldn’t like its taste while non-FFA members chose that it was against their morals. This may reveal a lower moral connection to animals when FFA members, or other individuals who work with animals regularly, spend more time with specific species. This study has implications in the field of psychology, but more specifically paradox, cognitive dissonance, and dehumanization studies. These results suggest for further research into the influence of other variables on ambivalence as well as additional maintenance strategies involved in paradoxes.
Downloads
References or Bibliography
Rozin, P. (1996). Towards a psychology of food and eating: From motivation to module to model to marker, morality, meaning, and metaphor. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 5(1), 18–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.ep10772690
Loughnan, S., Haslam, N., Bastian, B. (2010). The role of meat consumption in the denial of moral status and mind to meat animals. Appetite, 55(1), 156-159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2010.05.043
Loughnan, S., Bastian, B., Haslam, N. (2014). The psychology of eating animals. SAGE Journals, 23(2), 104-108. doi: 10.1177/0963721414525781
Buttlar, B. & Walther, E. (2018). Measuring the meat paradox: How ambivalence towards meat influences moral disengagement. Appetite, 128, 152-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2018.06.011
FFA. (n.d.). Retrieved April 1, 2020, from https://www.ffa.org/
FFA Vision, Mission and Motto. (n.d.). Retrieved April 1, 2020, from https://www.ffa.org/about/who-we-are/mission-motto/
SAE for ALL Evolving the Essentials. (n.d.). Retrieved April 3, 2020, from https://saeforall.org/immersion-sae/?wizard
Tomales FFA. (n.d.). Retrieved April 3, 2020, from https://www.tomalesfriendsofagriculture.org/tomales-ffa.html
Danovich, T. (2017, August 30). For 4-H Kids, Saying Goodbye To An Animal Can Be The Hardest Lesson. Retrieved April 3, 2020, from https://choice.npr.org/index.html?origin=https://www.npr.org/sections/thesalt/2017/08/30/545603450/for-4-h-kids-saying-goodbye-to-an-animal-can-be-the-hardest-lesson
Bohde, K. J. (2019, November 21). 4-H General Livestock Rules. Retrieved April 3, 2020, from https://extension.purdue.edu/hamilton/article/4406
Rothgerber, H. (2014). Efforts to overcome vegetarian-induced dissonance among meat eaters. Appetite, 79, 32-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2014.04.003
Tian, Q., Becker, M., Hilton, D. (2015). Confronting the meat paradox in different cultural contexts: Reactions among Chinese and French participants. Appetite, 96, 187-194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2015.09.009
Bastian, B., Loughnan, S. (2016). Resolving the Meat-Paradox: A Motivational Account of Morally Troublesome Behavior and Its Maintenance. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 21(3), 1-22. doi: 10.1177/1088868316647562
Viki, G. T., Osgood, D., & Phillips, S. (2013). Dehumanization and self-reported proclivity to torture prisoners of war. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(3), 325–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.11.006
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2020 Rachel Howard, Mrs. Jennifer Poole
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright holder(s) granted JSR a perpetual, non-exclusive license to distriute & display this article.
